So I finally took the wraps off the XTZ Analyzer Pro kit and did some test measurements. First, here's the kit if anyone is interested:
It comes in a nice carrying case, with everything foam padded for traveling:
Inside, you get requisite cables, microphone, USB sound card, and a little tripod to put the mic on!
You get this pretty cool looking keychain USB drive with the manual, but you have to download the software using the S/N from the kit.
I took a number of measurements. They have 3 tabs corresponding to 3 analyses they do. I focused only on one of them, called the Full Range analyses, where they graph frequency response and RT60 over that range. I did several measurements, and throwing out the extremes, this one looked to be like the average of my measurements:
What's interesting how close my room comes to how Stereophile measured the Alexias in Atkinson's room as well:
I'm not sure if I'm comparing the right graph in Stereophile's measurements, so someone please correct me if I'm offbase here. But you can see in both graphs the bass being reinforced at around 25hz, only to dip around 45-50hz, the mid bass hump around 60-80hz, then another dip around 125-130hz, another one at 260-300hz, then fairly flat until a suckout at 4khz, and then about 6-8khz, the treble just drops off precipitously. I thought the two graphs really resembled each other remarkabley close given two totally different rooms.
I think the rise in response at the frequency extremes is due to non-linearities in the mic, so I am going to ignore them. I certainly don't hear that energy at either end.
In the time domain, my RT60 times (if these are accurate) doesn't seem too bad (if I'm reading the graph correctly). Definitely some work to do, but 300ms is a good place to start and I'm not too far off in some frequencies.
Anyway, lots to learn about this tool and using this analysis to tune the room. More to come.