octadyndude
New member
:roflmao:If you point out bashing, then you are bashing and therefore you have no point? Yep, makes good sense. Are you in congress by any chance?
:roflmao:If you point out bashing, then you are bashing and therefore you have no point? Yep, makes good sense. Are you in congress by any chance?
Myles, that's why you don't go to other websites. I'm a SS guy but certainly enjoy tube gear as well. I think the bashing gets started when people start speaking in absolute terms. You yourself said on this thread that tubes were the best. Everyone needs to remember that this is a subjective hobby and need to remember this when speaking. This is why I always say that something sounds the best to me, with my ears and in my room.
This guy always beat his own path from way back then too:
Oskar Heil A.M.T.
The
research behind the Oskar A.V.T. ( AMT)
As a
physicist, Dr. Heil concentrated his study on how nature designed and
constructed the human ears. Then his studies concentrated on animals of a small
proportion, which can produce a loud sound, especially compared to their size.
These studies led to Dr. Heil’s formulation of his basic diaphragm design theory
and the subsequent development of the Oskar A.V.T. ( AMT) Air Velocity
Transformer.
Myles, that's why you don't go to other websites. I'm a SS guy but certainly enjoy tube gear as well. I think the bashing gets started when people start speaking in absolute terms. You yourself said on this thread that tubes were the best. Everyone needs to remember that this is a subjective hobby and need to remember this when speaking. This is why I always say that something sounds the best to me, with my ears and in my room.
Bold: Depends on what website you are on!
Now if you want the science of it, I don't think that science would back you up on the claim. The audio industry for example uses a model created between 1955 and 1965 for most of the kinds of measurements made on electronics. What has happened in the last 45 years has been major advances in our understanding of how the human ear/brain system works, yet almost none of those advances are represented by improvements in our measurement and testing regime. For example by 1965 we already knew that the ear uses higher orders (especially odd orders) of harmonics to sort out how loud a sound is, but the audio industry has pretty much ignored this fact for the last 45 years, instead encouraging design practice that actually *causes* such distortions rather than mitigating them.
Tubes, FWIW, generally speaking make less of these distortions. So recent science says something different from old science.
Why?I bash tubes.
Why?
What we need to bash or smash is our own biases.
I think this thread, as well as much of what goes on on most of these "high end audio forums" can best be summed up simply with three words:
boys with toys.
I used to just love heating old tubes up with a propane torch....watching the envelope collapse slowly. yea bashing tubes was fun also...but nothing comes close to me throwing a hammer at a television picture tube.. a blast that the neighbors heard!
'course this was the day when I had tons of told tubes laying around from old radios..Zenith and the like.
I do have a couple dead KT120's that no doubt I could have some fun with.
I think this thread, as well as much of what goes on on most of these "high end audio forums" can best be summed up simply with three words:
boys with toys.
am I "bashing" with such a comment?![]()