Seriously?
I think speaker aesthetics are pretty personal. The 60s-70s motif that seems to be popular on this forum is worse imo. Maybe i'm just too young (37) to respect that look.
And speaking of finding humor in a statement...
On page 60 of the Jan 2015 edition of Stereophile, there is a full page ad for the Raidho D-3 speaker. I love this line in the ad: "The D-3 is an extreme performer and is for those who really enjoy spending time and effort setting up their systems and finding matching components."
Holy cow. No joke.
I don't like the look of Vivid Audio's Giya loudspeakers. The look is a love or hate proposition.
Big +1 for hate camp here. I am scared of em.
But they do sound very nice indeed. I think they are (mostly) a better WAF speaker than most too.
And speaking of finding humor in a statement...
On page 60 of the Jan 2015 edition of Stereophile, there is a full page ad for the Raidho D-3 speaker. I love this line in the ad: "The D-3 is an extreme performer and is for those who really enjoy spending time and effort setting up their systems and finding matching components."
Still reading this thread. I'll bite..........
My 3rd dislike is Sonus Faber Lilium. They were driven by MC601s. Sounded mechanical, lacked dynamics. Probably all of that metallic ribbing and the glass hat made it sound artificial.
Ken, the 520 fits under an armpit......:doubtful::woot::audiophile:
Was probably the McIntosh amps Steve :fingers: :fingers: :fingers: :snicker:
And speaking of finding humor in a statement...
On page 60 of the Jan 2015 edition of Stereophile, there is a full page ad for the Raidho D-3 speaker. I love this line in the ad: "The D-3 is an extreme performer and is for those who really enjoy spending time and effort setting up their systems and finding matching components."
Another one: the Linn Climax 350A. While I love Linn for their electronics I don't connect at all to their speakers. The top of the line Climax 350A costs a lot of money but is not doing the trick for me....