MtnHam
Member
I hate to break it to you, but an RCM is an RCM in function. Designs may vary, but function is the same as the goal is the same for us vinyl folk. I get the same results from my VPI 16.5, proper cleaning fluids and proper methods. The point is that the gunk gets removed, one way or the other. If I had >3,000 LPs there would be no question that I would go for something quieter and full auto. As much as I enjoy cleaning records, I would not want to think about doing 3000 without automation or something. What needs to be kept in mind is that a record's cleanliness is mostly dependent on the condition in which it starts. No proper RCM is better than any other at doing this. You can't restore a record that has been beaten or whatnot whether you use a $600 RCM or $4000 RCM.
I hate to break it to you, but I don't think you are correct. Have you used either of the 2 ultrasonic machines? Have you read the reviews of the Klaudio by Myles B. Astor (klaudio record cleaner) and Micheal Fremer (KLAUDiO KD-CLN-LP200 Ultrasonic Record Cleaning Machine Reviewed | Analog Planet) ? Do so, and I think you will change your tune!
Also, there is an additional advantage- no static electricity from the cleaning process! Major, IMHO!