- Thread Author
- #1
Trying these babies out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mike ,
Did the use of MIT in the magico hq pique hour interest ? Also how many poles of articulation do those speaker cables have ?
Mike
You know I am a believer in cables that are supposed to do something to get us closer to what we want to hear. Good luck with your trials.
One of my local dealers swears by MIT and has used them for 20 years. I had an in-home demo for several weeks of an MIT loom and they definitely have a lot of strong points: terrific imaging and soundstage, detail and nuance, very low noise, neutrality and excellent speed and dynamics on transients. I believe I ended up sticking with my Cardas at the time because the MIT leaned a bit too much to the analytical side versus the organic sound of my Cardas. I'm sure Mike's MIT cables are a newer, higher and better version of what I demoed several years back.
Best,
Ken
I think the MIT cables might be a bit too much of a good thing for my tastes. Like you Ken I think i'd lean toward my current Jorma cables for their more natural/organic presentation, harmonic richness & touch more delicacy.The MIT cables match extremely well to the Magico sound. Big synergy there. I'm sure this is the reason Magico primarily uses them.
Ken
You need to listen to Jorma Statement with Magico MikeFrom my perspective, this is the best cable synergy I've ever heard with the Magico's in the store. I've tried: AQ, Siltech, Kimber, Ansuz, Tellurium Q, etc.
Frankly, it's not close. I now know why Magico uses them in the factory and the shows.
But....I keep listening.
You need to listen to Jorma Statement with Magico Mike.