Why no turntable?

Agreed. To think how far digital has come in the past 5 years alone.

I still think it’s fun to have both. That was my whole point. Like having a daily driver and a weekend sports car. [emoji6]

Yep vinyl is the mini-van while digital your sports car. :D
 
Having both formats is great. and on the digital side, it lets me discovery new music and artists via Tidal.


in MY personal experience, with Audiophile and Non-Audiophile recordings on vinyl, the music can be magical!


keep in mind the examples are strictly based on MY opinion. and just sharing my experience with Vinyl and Digital, to many examples to list.


Example : Regular LP's

Count Basie "Me and You" playing the Vinyl the dynamics are incredible and not the same on Tidal

Sarah Vaughan and Her Trio "At Mister Kelly's" a live recording has incredible room presence and her voice is great and don't get the same emotion of the recording on Tidal



Audiophile Examples:

Mofi---Dire Straits "Brothers in Arms" amazing on Vinyl (Dynamics) and on Tidal is very good but the Mofi is supreme.

Music Matters SRX---J.Coltrane "Blue Train" winner is Vinyl all the way.

Analogue Production---- Muddy Waters "Folk Singer" dynamics and emotion of Muddy is amazing on Vinyl, and good on Tidal

Analogue Production----HM "Hope" (Stimela--Coal Train) Vinyl smokes Digital!



having both formats, is a plus in my book, and hearing is believing !
 
Having both formats is great. and on the digital side, it lets me discovery new music and artists via Tidal.


in MY personal experience, with Audiophile and Non-Audiophile recordings on vinyl, the music can be magical!


keep in mind the examples are strictly based on MY opinion. and just sharing my experience with Vinyl and Digital, to many examples to list.


Example : Regular LP's

Count Basie "Me and You" playing the Vinyl the dynamics are incredible and not the same on Tidal

Sarah Vaughan and Her Trio "At Mister Kelly's" a live recording has incredible room presence and her voice is great and don't get the same emotion of the recording on Tidal



Audiophile Examples:

Mofi---Dire Straits "Brothers in Arms" amazing on Vinyl (Dynamics) and on Tidal is very good but the Mofi is supreme.

Music Matters SRX---J.Coltrane "Blue Train" winner is Vinyl all the way.

Analogue Production---- Muddy Waters "Folk Singer" dynamics and emotion of Muddy is amazing on Vinyl, and good on Tidal


having both formats, is a plus in my book, and hearing is believing !

TOTALLY agree!!! 1000%.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
...

Mofi---Dire Straits "Brothers in Arms" amazing on Vinyl (Dynamics) and on Tidal is very good but the Mofi is supreme.
...

Well known to be a 16/44.1 digital recording, using one of those early ADC's that Mike was denigrating earlier in this thread :wacko:
 
Well known to be a 16/44.1 digital recording, using one of those early ADC's that Mike was denigrating earlier in this thread :wacko:


the Mofi 45RPM is on a whole different level than anything on digital and CD.... smoking dynamics!
 
Well known to be a 16/44.1 digital recording, using one of those early ADC's that Mike was denigrating earlier in this thread :wacko:

Yes, an early Sony DASH recoding. Not stellar in any format IMO. But the vinyl does seem to take off some of the edge. Wish they had chosen tape. Would have sounded much better I’m sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
the Mofi 45RPM is on a whole different level than anything on digital and CD.... smoking dynamics!

Leading to the obvious question - how is this possible? And the answer, of course, is that it isn't, without some hocus-pocus in either the digital mastering or inaccuracies of LP playback, or both.
 
Having both formats is great. and on the digital side, it lets me discovery new music and artists via Tidal.


in MY personal experience, with Audiophile and Non-Audiophile recordings on vinyl, the music can be magical!


keep in mind the examples are strictly based on MY opinion. and just sharing my experience with Vinyl and Digital, to many examples to list.


Example : Regular LP's

Count Basie "Me and You" playing the Vinyl the dynamics are incredible and not the same on Tidal

Sarah Vaughan and Her Trio "At Mister Kelly's" a live recording has incredible room presence and her voice is great and don't get the same emotion of the recording on Tidal



Audiophile Examples:

Mofi---Dire Straits "Brothers in Arms" amazing on Vinyl (Dynamics) and on Tidal is very good but the Mofi is supreme.

Music Matters SRX---J.Coltrane "Blue Train" winner is Vinyl all the way.

Analogue Production---- Muddy Waters "Folk Singer" dynamics and emotion of Muddy is amazing on Vinyl, and good on Tidal


having both formats, is a plus in my book, and hearing is believing !

Listen to the 45 RPM version of MoFi BIA cut The Man's Too Strong and compare it to Tidal. The bass is incredibly powerful. The Tidal version is MIA.
 
Leading to the obvious question - how is this possible? And the answer, of course, is that it isn't, without some hocus-pocus in either the digital mastering or inaccuracies of LP playback, or both.

Where is the bottom end on the digital version vs. the MoFi 45 RPM?
 
Well known to be a 16/44.1 digital recording, using one of those early ADC's that Mike was denigrating earlier in this thread :wacko:

it was an early digital recording, but mastered to tape. so the definitive way to hear it is vinyl. the digital from the vinyl master will sound how that typically does.

agree on the MoFi 45, it's pretty good.
 
Leading to the obvious question - how is this possible? And the answer, of course, is that it isn't, without some hocus-pocus in either the digital mastering or inaccuracies of LP playback, or both.

It’s very possible. The turntable has its own set of variables. As one example, one can lower the VTA ever so slightly to take the edge of bright recordings. There is also the remastering stage (for vinyl). There also isn’t the hocus-pocus of added noise from a network which often reveals itself in the upper register. Conversely, the digital can also sound better in many systems with the right DAC, network, remastering, etc.

At the end of the day, it’s not a great recording, but it is a great album however you choose to enjoy it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
it was an early digital recording, but mastered to tape. so the definitive way to hear it is vinyl. the digital from the vinyl master will sound how that typically does.

agree on the MoFi 45, it's pretty good.

Damn, now I have to go back and listen to my MoFI pressing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Damn, now I have to go back and listen to my MoFI pressing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The MoFi 45 is the best version I have ever heard of this LP.
 
it was an early digital recording, but mastered to tape. so the definitive way to hear it is vinyl. the digital from the vinyl master will sound how that typically does.

I don't even know what this means? You're basically saying that all CD's will sound "better" (whatever that means) if one records them to tape and then listens to that. All very well and good, but "high fidelity" isn't part of that equation.

I wouldn't care about the audiophile love of LP's except for this phenomenon, that the record companies simply will not release a product that sounds as good as it can. No matter how good the 45 rpm LP sounds, a CD made from the original recording, properly mastered, would sound better; there's really no way that isn't true. BUT, apparently that isn't going to happen
 
I don't even know what this means? You're basically saying that all CD's will sound "better" (whatever that means) if one records them to tape and then listens to that. All very well and good, but "high fidelity" isn't part of that equation.

sigh.

I love 16/44 and listen to it often with great satisfaction. and music recorded and mastered to 16/44 is typically outstanding. I'm a 'native' guy and format agnostic in as much as I want to hear it as god intended......in the native recorded format. which is why I'm heavily invested in digital, vinyl and tape. I love all of the formats.

I was wrong above (that it was mastered to analog tape, it was mastered to DAT tape.....I got the tape part right) when I was going from my memory. here is what it says on the Wiki link....

Brothers in Arms was one of the first albums directed at the CD market, and was a full digital recording (DDD) at a time when most popular music was recorded on analog equipment. It was also released on vinyl (abridged to fit on one LP) and cassette. Producer Neil Dorfsman says the digital multitrack was mixed on an analog board with the resulting two track mix re-digitized via a Prism A/D converter and recorded on a DAT machine.

I have the dsd rip from the 96/24 sourced SACD of Brothers in Arms (and a quality way to play it back) and it is very nice.

I do have a number of digitally sourced Lp's where I do prefer the digital to the Lp. but it's a mixed situation 'depending'. in this case the 45rpm Lp is better. maybe the 'analog board' inserted between the direct recording and the DAT?

I wouldn't care about the audiophile love of LP's except for this phenomenon, that the record companies simply will not release a product that sounds as good as it can. No matter how good the 45 rpm LP sounds, a CD made from the original recording, properly mastered, would sound better; there's really no way that isn't true. BUT, apparently that isn't going to happen
 
I know DAT did not exist in 1985, when BIA was released. I also doubt that the Prism ADC existed then, so I’m not sure what that anecdote is about?
 
I’m curious, why don’t more audiophiles at least consider a basic vinyl rig? I’ve heard the regular reasons: too much care and feeding, I sold all my records, I’m not buying anymore vinyl, it’s too much hassle. But I personally don’t find that to be the case.

Wouldn’t having a turntable in addition to a great digital setup be nice?

The great thing about a turntable is that a great turntable today will be a great turntable in 10 or 20 years from now. Wouldn’t that be a good investment?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I had a reasonably nice turn table and cart - something from rega and a grado cart on it. Neither were top of the line nor entry level. I paired it with a simple Schiit phono amp and bought some records. It sounded great and wasn't as fussy as I thought it would be - though the driver excursion did scare the hell out of me at times.

The sound was good but certainly not as detailed as the digital I like. There was a wonderful body to vocals that I really enjoyed but I did find it a bit too rich and dark for my liking. I'll chalk that up to the rega - I've never been a fan of the traditional british hifi sound. My favorite audio products from the UK are chord and dcs if that gives an idea of my preference (hell, liking soulution and magico probably gives an even better idea).

I ended up selling it all after about a year for pretty much no cost to own. Most of the music I listen to just isn't released on vinyl. Despite this knowledge, I may continue to be a silly audiophile by...picking up a more expensive turntable and giving it another shot lol but it's at the bottom of my list. The generally higher dynamic range of most recordings on vinyl vs digital is certainly enticing so I keep a look out to see if more artists are releasing on vinly. To that end, they are, but still not at that critical mass where I feel compelled to set up another TT rig.
 
Back
Top