Audioseduction
Active member
I guess if you implement all of the compensations for the additional RF noise, vibration and heat generated by the drives while accessing the data that would be acceptable. I see Aurender uses large heat sinks for a passive cooling and the heat sink also acts as a RF noise screen. The hard drives are mounted to a special support frame with rubber pads, which mechanically decouples the two. Also the unit copies the playlist "music files" from the HD to the SSD and then turns off the HDs and plays the files from the SSD.
I feel why do all that just to have local storage when you can have your file storage on a remote device and not have the vibration & RF issues in the first place.
I have JRiver set as a memory player which means it streams the files form a remote storage device, processes the music file entirely and place the processed data in a 1GB buffer before it starts playing the track. This way there is no issue with latency, vibration, RF or heat generated from mechanical HDs. I can say the playback is sublime x2.
I think if you have used a Windows OS platform for your music server you would had a better outcome.
I feel why do all that just to have local storage when you can have your file storage on a remote device and not have the vibration & RF issues in the first place.
I have JRiver set as a memory player which means it streams the files form a remote storage device, processes the music file entirely and place the processed data in a 1GB buffer before it starts playing the track. This way there is no issue with latency, vibration, RF or heat generated from mechanical HDs. I can say the playback is sublime x2.

I think if you have used a Windows OS platform for your music server you would had a better outcome.