RMAF 2014 Audioshark Awards

Mike

Audioshark
Staff member
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
30,486
Location
Sarasota, FL
Audioshark RMAF 2014 Awards

A little background on the event this year. I felt attendance was down – slightly, but we were treated to some unique smaller companies and some new startups. What was missing was many of the big boys: Magico, Vivid, Tannoy and several others.

As always, RMAF for me, is not only about seeing and hearing new gear or new combinations of gear, its about the great people in this industry and the great audiophiles who keep the engine running. RMAF is more “consumer” than the Consumer Electronics Show. RMAF is about two channel and not TV’s, cellphones and microwaves. It’s a place for all us crazy folks to get together in one place and share our love of music and high fidelity.

The first Audioshark.org dinner was a lot of fun and it was great to put a face to a name. I want to thank everyone who attended for making it a special evening.

OK….on to the awards….

Best Sounding Room (cost no object):

Focal/Soulution/Transrotor/Air Tight/Tara Labs

To be honest, this wasn’t an easy decision. Not because there were so many great rooms that just blew me away, but because there wasn’t. That being said, this room was consistently the best sounding – and given its price tag – so it should be.

The big Focal Grande Utopia EM’s powered by the awesome Soulution 701 monos and 725 preamp, with the latest Soulution digital source and the wonderful sounding Transrotor Turntable/AirTight Cart, all backed by TaraLabs cabling was capable of great sound and they provided that most consistently.

attachment.php


attachment.php


Runner Up:

This is a tie between the Focal Grande Utopia/VAC Statement/Esoteric/Clear Audio and the Wilson Sasha 2/Watch Dog subs/VTL Siegfried Stereo amps/VTL preamp and DCS Vivaldi digital stack.

There were times when I went into these rooms and they sounded superb, and either one could have easily been picked as the winner – but there were times I went into both room and neither lived up to their billing. Let me explain. The VAC room with vinyl as a source sounded muddy and slow – all those tubes were too much of a good thing. Did I just say that? Either that, or there was just a real mismatch with the ClearAudio table/cart/phonostage. When you could walk right next door in a same/similar sized/shaped room and hear the Focal Grande Utopia EM’s (same speakers) on a full Soulution setup, it left little room for doubt as to which combo was better. I kept wondering if this was some sinister plan on the part of Focal. That being said, the VAC/Focal room with a digital source sounded excellent and definitely gave me pause for thought.

The Wilson Sasha 2’s combined with the big VTL Siegfried Stereo amps and the Wilson Watchdog subs had the capability of also winning first place for me. However, far too many times I went into this room Peter was playing the most boring classical music ever produced. I kept thinking – how in the heck does a solo violin demonstrate the capabilities of this system? Was this simply a “safe choice” to keep us off our game? That being said, when I did hear other types of music – even a full symphony, this system really shined for me and could have easily been picked first.

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php



Best Sounding Room (under $100K):

I found the Tidal/Bricasti Design room consistently sounding good. The big Bricasti M28 amps, paired with the Bricasti M1 DAC produced a balanced, good sound. I returned to this room three times and each time it sounded great. I’m not sure what was doing what to make it sound so good – was it the Tidal speakers, big M28 amps or the M1? Not sure – what it sounded was great.

attachment.php


Best Value of Show:

Unlike the Best Sounding Room award, this was an easy choice. The modestly priced Ryan R630 speakers (Floorstanding 3 Way) really really impressed me. Priced at $5000 MSRP for the pair and using all drivers made by Ryan Speakers, finished in a beautiful wood cabinet, made in America and sounding many multiples its price tag was an easy pick. I went back to this room at least half a dozen times thinking “they just can’t be this good for this price.” It is without a doubt that these $5000 speakers were vastly superior to some $60,000 speakers I heard this weekend. The two Brothers who founded Ryan Speakers were building speakers in the 80’s before going their separate ways and reuniting less than 2 years ago.

They build everything in house: drivers, tweeter, crossover, cabinets. They know how to minimize cabinet resonances, make a tweeter that sounds smooth as butter but detailed and a $5000 speaker that images as good as many speakers costing a lot more.

attachment.php


Best Digital of Show:

Do you remember that commercial: “It slices, it dices, but wait, there’s more!” Well, that might become the new marketing slogan for the B.M.C. digital stack.

The new B.M.C. Pure Media ($4890 MSRP) and UltraDAC ($3490) provided a killer one-two punch for anyone looking for the ultimate home audio/video solution. Full specs and details here: PureMedia - B.M.C. Audio and UltraDAC | B.M.C. Audio - B.M.C. Audio

When I left this room, I asked myself, “what doesn’t it do?”

attachment.php


Best Analog of Show:

I really enjoyed the consistently great sound from the Transrotor Orion Reference table and Air Tight PC1 cartridge in the Focal/Soulution room. There was a great synergy between the table/arm/cart in this room. No matter what they played, it always sounded great – even compared to the Soulution Digital stack in the same room.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • DSC01155.jpg
    DSC01155.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 277
  • DSC01156.jpg
    DSC01156.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 274
  • DSC01152.jpg
    DSC01152.jpg
    116.3 KB · Views: 277
  • DSC01355.jpg
    DSC01355.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 278
  • DSC01358.jpg
    DSC01358.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 277
  • DSC01395.jpg
    DSC01395.jpg
    45.8 KB · Views: 280
  • DSC01218.jpg
    DSC01218.jpg
    49.6 KB · Views: 279
  • DSC01073.jpg
    DSC01073.jpg
    116.1 KB · Views: 277
  • DSC01158.jpg
    DSC01158.jpg
    113.7 KB · Views: 276
very nice Mike, thank you for all the great coverage and pics and everything!!!
 
Thx Mike. Excellent show coverage.

Concerns me that it appears the number of big companies continue to go down at the show. Also, attendance was less last year than in prior years so if you feel there were less audio enthusiasts at the show this past weekend, I'm concerned about the future of the fest in Denver.
 
Thanks, Mike. I do have a question/comment, though; every year (at least the past 4) attendees and reviewers comment that attendance seems down, and then later the Colorado Audio society says no, that's not so?
 
Thanks for the coverage Mike.

Arkansas Mike, it's not surprising that exhibitor attendance (and subsequently visitor attendance) is seemingly dwindling. There are so many shows all over the country all year round and IMO the exhibitor's have to pick and choose which shows to attend due to time demands and cost vs. returns. Just my two cents.

I attended RMAF on Saturday only and wasn't terribly impressed this year. There were a number of nice sounding rooms, but I found a majority didn't sound that great to my ears. Biggest problem for me was boomy & muddy bass or rooms playing at volume levels far too great for me with the mid range frequencies screetching away. I know lots of folks want to listen at louder volumes than me but when there's muddy / boomy bass or mid range whistles or squeals at those increased volumes I tend to just turn around and exit a room.

Nice tight bass (at visceral volumes or not) doesn't bother me whereas boomy, sloppy undefined bass does. Smooth mid range vocals and instruments don't bother me but loud peak levels of a whistle or fingers sliding on guitar strings does.

Overall I'm kind of glad I only had 6 or so hours to visit the show. Anything more would have gotten a little tedious for me.

But hey, I did have some great Mexican food on the way out of town.


p.s. The show is nice for looking at gear that you otherwise might not be able to see at a local dealer, etc.
 
Thanks, Mike. I do have a question/comment, though; every year (at least the past 4) attendees and reviewers comment that attendance seems down, and then later the Colorado Audio society says no, that's not so?

Not sure - haven't seen the actual numbers - but it seemed down a little.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Not sure - haven't seen the actual numbers - but it seemed down a little.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I thought attendance was better than last year. What was deceiving was that folks this year came in a steady stream than one big bunch on Saturday. Friday and Sunday, typically dead as a doornail at most audio shows, were pretty busy. Seemed a little slow early Sat but attendance seemed to pick up after lunchtime.

Seemed everytime I wanted to go into a room, they were packed.
 
Thx Mike. Excellent show coverage.

Concerns me that it appears the number of big companies continue to go down at the show. Also, attendance was less last year than in prior years so if you feel there were less audio enthusiasts at the show this past weekend, I'm concerned about the future of the fest in Denver.

Who was there last year that wasn't this year? No one that I can remember. In fact, pretty much everybody had the same rooms as last year. There were six floors of exhibitors in the tower, two in the atrium plus the conference rooms on the main floor. In fact, this show with around 150 rooms is probably 3X as large as any other consumer show in the US. So what actually is the problem?

I don't see any threat to the show continuing. Every manufacturer was quite pleased with the turnout. Also remember it's quality over quantity. What good, for instance, is it if you have 100,000 show up if only 10% are serious?
 
Thanks, Mike. I do have a question/comment, though; every year (at least the past 4) attendees and reviewers comment that attendance seems down, and then later the Colorado Audio society says no, that's not so?

Who should you believe? The people with the ticket numbers or some reviewers who don't see the lines at the front desk all day long because they're in the exhibitor rooms?
 
I thought attendance was better than last year. What was deceiving was that folks this year came in a steady stream than one big bunch on Saturday. Friday and Sunday, typically dead as a doornail at most audio shows, were pretty busy. Seemed a little slow early Sat but attendance seemed to pick up after lunchtime.

Seemed everytime I wanted to go into a room, they were packed.

Could very well be. Plus, the show was more spread out than last year and that can skew things. Guess we will have to wait for the numbers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
MBL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Only because Jeremy couldn't make it because he's facing back surgery. Otherwise, he would have been there.

There were also many new companies exhibiting for the first time such as Magnepan, Triangle Arts, Polymer Audio, etc. There were also at least four new stores showing at RMAF. About the company/store of note that I can think of was Paragon Sight and Sound.
 
Only because Jeremy couldn't make it because he's facing back surgery. Otherwise, he would have been there.

There were also many new companies exhibiting for the first time such as Magnepan, Triangle Arts, Polymer Audio, etc. There were also at least four new stores showing at RMAF. About the company/store of note that I can think of was Paragon Sight and Sound.

Wasn't aware - hope his surgery goes well. Yes, lots of new companies and CANJAM brought in its mix of folks too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Wasn't aware - hope his surgery goes well. Yes, lots of new companies and CANJAM brought in its mix of folks too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, saw Jeremy two weeks ago in New York, but apparently his back got really bad between the NY and RMAF shows. :(
 
Back
Top