New Vintage Audio Restoration HQ

[atmasphere]

If you keep this up there's a good chance it will look better than when it was new...

 

[Michaels HiFi]

If you keep this up there's a good chance it will look better than when it was new...

Well I just received the latest unit I'm going to try and learn to save.

It's a 1947 NRI (Triplett) Model 67.

I much prefer the testers from the 30's and 40's - much easier for me to try and learn than the 'newer' ones.

It's a metal case so it will be much easier to restore than a wood one falling back on my days of detailing cars.

 

[Michaels HiFi]

Bringing the original 1935 leather strap back to life.

I used the same products used on super-expensive saddles and such.

First deep cleaning - but carefully as the leather was brittle and could fall apart.

Then 20+ applications over several days of leather oil applying it heavily and letting it soak in (you can see it soaking in the photo). Keep doing this until it doesn't absorb any more.

Then a manual application of leather Baum to help seal in the moisture and protect the leather from the elements.

I probably spent more on product to try and save it than if I had just had a new one made. LOL

 

[atmasphere]

Had you considered having someone make a strap for you? If the leather is rotted it can give away without warning.

 

[Michaels HiFi]

Had you considered having someone make a strap for you? If the leather is rotted it can give away without warning.

I have and you're right - I would never trust them due to age. I think that would be an accident waiting to happen.

Even if the strap were fine, I wouldn't trust the screws that go into the wood. They are usually really small and possibly stripped in the wood from previous careless owners.

I never carry by the straps so it's more to preserve the originality and for the fun of restoration. I like the effort involved in bringing it back to life. It's a challenge for me.

Even with my metal military testers with metal handles - I always carry them like a pizza box as I never trust any handles/hinges/hardware that is usually 75-95 years old.

 

[Michaels HiFi]

Pretty excited about today's score.

After months of looking for the right one at the right price, I got a Weston 798 1940's tube tester.

Very different than Hickok's, many feel it's more accurate than the Hickoks. I can't say if that is true or not, however it DOES use a 5KHz signal feature, and the Weston testers place higher voltage on the plate of the tube which is supposed to give it more accurate readings.

I will also say when the FAA bought tube testers to be used in the towers and airplanes, they went with the Weston version, not Hickok.

It's right on that line of being new enough to test a very wide range of tubes I use, while still being old enough to get the variety of 4 pin tubes I have.

As testers moved into the 1950's, many of them dropped 4 pin sockets all tougher (think 2A3, 45, 300B). Or if they didn't drop the 4 pin, it was a secondary function so the testing of those tubes wasn't the most accurate.

This one has a very good faceplate, the owner sent me pics of it on the multimeter so I know it's accurate and working, AND - my favorite part - the outside metal case needs LOTS of TLC. I'll defiantly be working some magic on the case.

 

[atmasphere]

Pretty excited about today's score.

After months of looking for the right one at the right price, I got a Weston 798 1940's tube tester.

Very different than Hickok's, many feel it's more accurate than the Hickoks. I can't say if that is true or not, however it DOES use a 5KHz signal feature, and the Weston testers place higher voltage on the plate of the tube which is supposed to give it more accurate readings.

I will also say when the FAA bought tube testers to be used in the towers and airplanes, they went with the Weston version, not Hickok.

It's right on that line of being new enough to test a very wide range of tubes I use, while still being old enough to get the variety of 4 pin tubes I have.

As testers moved into the 1950's, many of them dropped 4 pin sockets all tougher (think 2A3, 45, 300B). Or if they didn't drop the 4 pin, it was a secondary function so the testing of those tubes wasn't the most accurate.

This one has a very good faceplate, the owner sent me pics of it on the multimeter so I know it's accurate and working, AND - my favorite part - the outside metal case needs LOTS of TLC. I'll defiantly be working some magic on the case.

Fabulous tester! I'd be tempted on something like that to give the case a nice vintage finish such as a wrinkletex battleship gray finish.

This is one I've had on hand for a while; not as nice as that but is a true transconductance tester: