a.wayne
Well-known member
Did he try Boulder vs bridged Luxmans ..?
Did he try Boulder vs bridged Luxmans ..?[/QUOTE
In the early days of the Journey, Jay raved about a pair of m900u's. To my knowledge, any comparison he has made to the Luxman since then would be based on memory, as I have been using those very amps -- in mono and stereo -- to happily drive any number of speakers, from YG to AG. I'd be surprised if he ever brought back a pair in the interim, though I admit I've only looked in on the Journey from time to time.
Parker
edit: PS And remember, there's been a bit of speaker churn since the early days as well ...
As far as I recall, Jay tried the 900 only as a stereo amp, as monoblock we are talking about different level of performance.
Warmth should come from the recording not the stereo, dry , warm , full , cold , clinical, fast , ideally all of these traits should come from the recording being played, the correct setup will exhibits these traits when it is presented in the recordings and not the electronics.
aside , of course its necessary to select what you think delivers you there...
I find Boulder gets out of the way and allow this to happen , thin in , thin out ..!
Regards
I'm done with anything carrying the 900u name. I am looking ahead for what is next for Luxman.
I think Jay has a successful youtube channel devoted to constant component churn, not available to most of us. Some find it interesting and valuable in their journey and that's a great thing. Others might not find it as interesting or valuable. Sometimes I do, and sometimes I don't.
Well compared to a 50k amp, I guess 15 k will be mid fi......in my view as well. and they may be quite good too