Vinyl vs Digital?
Tubes vs SS?
Tubes vs SS?
Its nice, for PCM. Spent a weekend with Audiocrack in Holland with a new out of box SE GG Dac playing DSD from a basic MB Pro and his Trinity Dac playing PCM from the Trinity server. Like Adam, he has a GG for DSD and Trinity for PCM.thanks Paul.
I could not agree with you more about the remarkable staying power of the MPS-5. I had the very, very first MPS-5 in customer hands back in June 2006. and here 9 years later on it's 25th software release it's still relevant and competitive at the top of the dsd world, and still respectable PCM performance. it was a good value in 2006 and still is.
Measurement!But then what would we have to discuss??
Its nice, for PCM. Spent a weekend with Audiocrack in Holland with a new out of box SE GG Dac playing DSD from a basic MB Pro and his Trinity Dac playing PCM from the Trinity server. Like Adam, he has a GG for DSD and Trinity for PCM.
As I said, different flavours of delicious ice cream.
I have heard the PBD on 2 occasions and its very good, but I like the Lampi better for DSD and PCM….YMMV.
Guys, why beat a dead horse? PCM v DSD is getting old. Just get over it. It all sounds good! Life's too short to worry about it. :happy:
Hi Mike,
Adam and Audiocrack would agree with that conclusion and so would I. I already prefer the Big7 to the PBD, and I expect a broken in GG is another notch or 2 up the ladder.
The chipless DSD is the best DSD I have heard so far.
Hi Mike,
BTW, what transport/server do you use for the Trinity?
I've observed you and Paul go round and round (and round again) about what approach to dsd playback is correct. so I will simply not go there.:snicker:
at some point soon i'll get to sit down and listen to the Lampy and come to my own conclusion.
Have you heard a broken in GG do DSD, for example?
for now i'm using my old server and NAS. I did move the CPU downstairs so I can eliminate the USB over Ethernet extender and use the Totaldac USB cable and a Regen. moving the CPU downstairs and the new USB cable were clear definite steps up in performance.
i'm building a CAPS v4 Pipeline 'hot rodded' server with a stand alone LPS; still waiting for one part to arrive to get that done.
since this server will be for both my PCM Trinity and the dsd Playbacks Design I need to use a generic server. the Trinity PC & Drive would only be for the Trinity. and I have my son the Network Engineer to assist.
Mike, PM Fred and see if he can lend you a demo. Maybe after the CAF?
for now i'm using my old server and NAS. I did move the CPU downstairs so I can eliminate the USB over Ethernet extender and use the Totaldac USB cable and a Regen. moving the CPU downstairs and the new USB cable were clear definite steps up in performance.
i'm building a CAPS v4 Pipeline 'hot rodded' server with a stand alone LPS; still waiting for one part to arrive to get that done.
since this server will be for both my PCM Trinity and the dsd Playbacks Design I need to use a generic server. the Trinity PC & Drive would only be for the Trinity. and I have my son the Network Engineer to assist.
there is a reviewer a few hundred miles away with a GG that is still breaking in which I may travel to hear once it's broken in. should be within a few weeks.
there is a reviewer a few hundred miles away with a GG that is still breaking in which I may travel to hear once it's broken in. should be within a few weeks.
Why do you say he is a DSD hater? He says that DSD can provide spectacular audio performance. You and others may subjectively prefer DSD, but that has nothing to do with the question if the technical arguments in the paper linked in the OP are correct. As far as I understand them, they are correct. I don't see how this is connected to 'hating', it's just facts.Old stuff. The guy is a DSD hater. Whenyou hear quality DSD done right, there can be no question.Nothing to see there.
Tom and others (like Jud) have dealt with is multiple times and on multiple forums. Eg. here:Why do you say he is a DSD hater? He says that DSD can provide spectacular audio performance. You and others may subjectively prefer DSD, but that has nothing to do with the question if the technical arguments in the paper linked in the OP are correct. As far as I understand them, they are correct. I don't see how this is connected to 'hating', it's just facts.
Tom and others (like Jud) have dealt with is multiple times and on multiple forums. Eg. here:
Audio Myth - "DSD Provides a direct stream from A/D to D/A." - Page 3
Not about to re-enter that dead-end debate. I have said both formats can sound spectacular and that DSD is "easier" to play back correctly.
Enjoy what you like and I will do the same.
I call Bud a hater? Hahahahah. I have no idea whether Bud likes DSD or not and dont really care. You clearly show up your chip on the shoulder in many of your posts.Ummm, I don't want to speak for Al but I wonder maybe if part of the problem is that you say things like: "When you hear quality DSD done right, there can be no question." And yet in the same post you call Bud the hater. Do ya think just maybe???
As a founding member of the "Keep Norman Real Society" I endeavor to reference the obvious as it occurs.
I call Bud a hater? Hahahahah. I have no idea whether Bud likes DSD or not and dont really care. You clearly show up your chip on the shoulder in many of your posts.
I now have to question your comprehension skills. I was clearly speaking about the Benchmark guy and I am far from the first to call him a DSD Hater. People even found it hilarious that despite his anti-DSD tirades, he put the feature in his Dac.
I hope you are well paid for your self appointed job.
Ummm, I don't want to speak for Al but I wonder maybe if part of the problem is that you say things like: "When you hear quality DSD done right, there can be no question." And yet in the same post you call the guy in Bud's post the hater. Do ya think just maybe???
As a founding member of the "Keep Norman Real Society" I endeavor to reference the obvious as it occurs.