Budgeting your system

Wow lets see about 45,000 CD's at a 2 bucks each ought to do it. :D

hahaha yeah something like that :)
straight from Discogs.com, where I keep my collection organized...


Collection Value:*

Min $104,520.33 Med $151,234.39 Max $219,882.44


9219 items in total... And I'm not even close to be done putting them all there...

 
One comment about cabling. I can't see budgeting more than 10%cables and power cords on a system totaling $10k or less. Spending $1K or more on cables in lower cost systems is a waste of money that could be put to better speakers or electronics. There are plenty of good sounding IC's, speaker wire and usb cables that can be had for a lot less. Cables would be the easiest and cheapest to upgrade at a later date if you were building a system from scratch. I recently bought a pair of 1 meter XLR cables made of Belden 8402 for my son for $60pr. I tried them in my system and compared them to my Cardas Parsec's and AQ Columbia DBS 72V XLR's and I ended up keeping them and giving the Parsecs to my son. The 8402 were surprisingly way better than the Cardas and AQ's.

If any one is interested in them-

https://btpa.com/IC8402XLR-XX.html

They can also be bought here-

http://www.takefiveaudio.com/products/1693-belden-8402-ag-deep-cryo-treated/
 
hahaha yeah something like that :)
straight from Discogs.com, where I keep my collection organized...


Collection Value:*

Min $104,520.33 Med $151,234.39 Max $219,882.44


9219 items in total... And I'm not even close to be done putting them all there...


I don't want to even know, or think about it.
 
I know you (and likely others) won't believe this, perhaps only the SELECT II owners will at this point, but the SELECT II is such a breakthrough in digital, that it really changes the way you see a system.

Before, people got whatever digital "du jour", and then worked their system around it. DAC too harsh? Tame it with a nicely colored preamp. Or cables. Or bass traps. Or they just didn't care enough about digital and focused in their analog.

With the SELECT II, you don't need to. What you'll get out of the outputs is as close to the original recording as currently possible. So, just add any neutral enough amps, and you're all set. A suitably resolving speaker must also be part of this, of course...

MSB was never the DAC "du jour", it still isn't, and doesn't want to be either.

The jury is still out there for the MSB Reference, but that promises to be the answer for a lot of folks' prayers, for a more reasonably priced SELECT II. So, couple that with the now mythical, hopefully still forthcoming, cheaper darTZeel monoblocks, and you have a killer system :)

So, for those of us who don't have SELECT II, our preamp must be colored, cables must be hiding something or we don't care about digital enough?
For $90k, most of us here can build a superb digital system from scratch. Just saying..
 
ARC REF10 + Auralic G2 stack + AMG V12 + REF3 Phono + Transfiguration Proteus would work.

Based on what myself and others heard at Munich, the Auralic G2 is going to be killer (poor man's Vivaldi Stack without giving up much). We will have to wait until the fall.

I predict the Auralic G2 stack could upset the digital apple cart.

https://www.audiostream.com/content/auralic-g2-series

http://www.digitalaudioreview.net/2017/05/auralic-tease-aries-g2-streamer-vega-g2-dac-more/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So, for those of us who don't have SELECT II, our preamp must be colored, cables must be hiding something or we don't care about digital enough?
For $90k, most of us here can build a superb digital system from scratch. Just saying..

kzhtoo,

So you don't think *some* preamps color the sound? Or that *some* cables do the same?
The scenario I posed above, don't you think it's feasible that people (not saying you or even anybody in this forum) would be using cables and other devices in the audio chain to compensate for a lacking source? Mike mentioned a few posts back the "sources first" mentality. You can't fix what was broken from the start... People try, but that doesn't mean it's the right way to do it...

Oh, and I don't doubt superb sound can be had for a fraction of the $90k. I just don't think anything gets even close to the SELECT, though. Not that I've heard.

Have you heard the SELECT II, either at a show or a friend/dealer's?
 
ARC REF10 + Auralic G2 stack + AMG V12 + REF3 Phono + Transfiguration Proteus would work.

Based on what myself and others heard at Munich, the Auralic G2 is going to be killer (poor man's Vivaldi Stack without giving up much). We will have to wait until the fall.

I predict the Auralic G2 stack could upset the digital apple cart.

https://www.audiostream.com/content/auralic-g2-series

http://www.digitalaudioreview.net/2017/05/auralic-tease-aries-g2-streamer-vega-g2-dac-more/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I dig new G2s look. Good move by Auralic. Now, we are talking, esp. Vega G2, with all those features at an attractive price point. Will be an interesting comparison with Ayre QX-8.
 
kzhtoo,

So you don't think *some* preamps color the sound? Or that *some* cables do the same?
The scenario I posed above, don't you think it's feasible that people (not saying you or even anybody in this forum) would be using cables and other devices in the audio chain to compensate for a lacking source? Mike mentioned a few posts back the "sources first" mentality. You can't fix what was broken from the start... People try, but that doesn't mean it's the right way to do it...

If you had said this instead of your preceding post, I probably would have agreed with you.

Oh, and I don't doubt superb sound can be had for a fraction of the $90k. I just don't think anything gets even close to the SELECT, though. Not that I've heard.

Have you heard the SELECT II, either at a show or a friend/dealer's?

No, I haven't heard the SELECT II. But I'm sure it's 9 times better than Chord DAVE and 5 times better than Berkeley Ref2.
 
kzhtoo

I doubt seriously that it is multiple times better than either of the DACs you referenced but Alex doesn't sell either one of those products. And even the two you listed are not on the buy list for the "average" buyer. The answer to good sound is not always tied to cost unless you need it to be.
 
kzhtoo

I doubt seriously that it is multiple times better than either of the DACs you referenced but Alex doesn't sell either one of those products. And even the two you listed are not on the buy list for the "average" buyer. The answer to good sound is not always tied to cost unless you need it to be.

Jack,

You're right in that good sound comes in all price points. Hence your Aqua La Voce, a *killer* DAC, and not only for its price. And those PS Audio monoblocks, killer stuff too.
 
Unfortunately I, and most of us are not 1%'ers.... actually 99% of us are not.... therefore there is no way that a DAC that cost more than my Benz would ever be considered anything but Ludacris.... however there are very good DACs that my old ears could probably not hear a difference in anyway that are a world less in price.... my W4S DAC2v2SE for example that comes in at just under $4k. I doubt that I could hear a difference between this and the $100k DACs anyway....
 
For me the price relation between components is not so important, but we need to be aware that the weak link in our system will determine the final result. Listen to this system with good headphones to get an idea of the quality of this system. I garantee that the quality is way beyond the price tag.



The system is aprox. 150.000€ and more than 100.000€ is just for cables! And the is a big investment is antivibration systems...

The system is from Sonus Sutor, they sell Audiofidem cables and speakers.
 
kzhtoo

I doubt seriously that it is multiple times better than either of the DACs you referenced but Alex doesn't sell either one of those products. And even the two you listed are not on the buy list for the "average" buyer. The answer to good sound is not always tied to cost unless you need it to be.

Exactly the point. The two reference DACs that aren't on the buy list for the "average" buyers are 9 times and 5 times cheaper than the SELECT II respectively.

I'm not trying to start another this-is-too-expensive complaint. My initial post is a reply to the comment of "if you don't have SELECT II, your preamps/cables must be colored". I just do not get this logic to say the least.
 
kzhtoo,

So you don't think *some* preamps color the sound? Or that *some* cables do the same?
The scenario I posed above, don't you think it's feasible that people (not saying you or even anybody in this forum) would be using cables and other devices in the audio chain to compensate for a lacking source? Mike mentioned a few posts back the "sources first" mentality. You can't fix what was broken from the start... People try, but that doesn't mean it's the right way to do it...

Oh, and I don't doubt superb sound can be had for a fraction of the $90k. I just don't think anything gets even close to the SELECT, though. Not that I've heard.

Have you heard the SELECT II, either at a show or a friend/dealer's?

I think a lot of people just chase a certain sound regardless of gear or how much it cost. . I know my 1950 Martin D28, I can change a brand of strings and size and change the sound to fit a type of music. Why not audio. I harbor no ill feelings to a person that can spend $90k of a dac, god bless em, but it doesn't take $90k to make a person enjoy their music the way they like it.
 
For me the price relation between components is not so important, but we need to be aware that the weak link in our system will determine the final result. Listen to this system with good headphones to get an idea of the quality of this system. I garantee that the quality is way beyond the price tag.



The system is aprox. 150.000€ and more than 100.000€ is just for cables! And the is a big investment is antivibration systems...

The system is from Sonus Sutor, they sell Audiofidem cables and speakers.



100K worth of cables ...... Is that with launch and traction control ..?



:)
 
I think a lot of people just chase a certain sound regardless of gear or how much it cost. . I know my 1950 Martin D28, I can change a brand of strings and size and change the sound to fit a type of music. Why not audio. I harbor no ill feelings to a person that can spend $90k of a dac, god bless em, but it doesn't take $90k to make a person enjoy their music the way they like it.


Everything colors the sound , record a live session and see , of course, some color more than others , the biggest issue is how much coloration before placebo kicks in , the brain takes over once our system gets us close Enuff to "real" , this level of "real" varies from listener to listener ...


Regards
 
Everything colors the sound , record a live session and see , of course, some color more than others , the biggest issue is how much coloration before placebo kicks in , the brain takes over once our system gets us close Enuff to "real" , this level of "real" varies from listener to listener ...


Regards


Sure everything colors the sound, my room, myself setting in the room, my tubes, my cartridge etc. etc. I get it but why should we care. You like a way music sounds to you, I could careless if its colored or plain straight up neutral. I don't see any issues at all, people and artist add color or not to their system/music because THEY WANT TO, not to please the audio forum experts. Yep the brain and our inner neurological conduits process what our memory likes and you know it doesn't have to be neutral it could very well be that placebo you speak of with some color added, or even dry or bright, or bassy or loud, but there is nothing wrong with that, its what the listener likes.
 
I could care less if music is colored as long as it sounds great. I actually prefer a slightly warmer and darker sound. I use to be an accuracy, resolution and detail freak but I have mellowed and like a more romantic sound if you will. It certainly helps with poorly recorded music but more importantly it puts a smile on my face and I find myself enjoying the music rather than nitpicking the sound. I have slowly acquired gear that will give me some of that sound.
 
How do you know if the music is colored anyway? It's what sounds good to you that matters. For example, my home town line (McIntosh) has an extremely strong and vocal following. They will swear up and down that it is the best sounding equipment on the planet. To me it is good sounding (listening to it all my life) but there is other equipment that sometimes cost less that sounds much better. There is no right or wrong.... and honestly, who is to say that the $90k DAC sounds better? Maybe my $4k DAC sounds better to me in my system. I have heard many system that cost a ton more than mine that I do not like the sound of at all. A great example is at a club meeting we checked out a new speaker that was being reviewed. It was a $40k speaker, and honestly, I did not like it at all, and I would not consider owning them. And I like his electronics (other than he does not have support for DSD :)... dam audio reviewers :D )...
 
Have you heard the SELECT II, either at a show or a friend/dealer's?

What were they playing at the LAAS with the YGs ? Its not like I care much but if they were playing a Select II, I will have a tough time even justifying the reason why one would put 90k on it....to my ears, the sound just didn't impress me, forget the price tag that comes along...
 
Back
Top