AI music, let’s discuss the elephant in the room

Mike

Mike

Audioshark
Staff member
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
31,106
Location
Sarasota, FL
It started rather innocent with a clever track or two using Johnny Cash’s voice. But today, AI is creating fictitious artists producing entire albums with convincing voices and songs.

I am unsure where I stand on this issue. On one hand, I know it’s not real. On the other hand, I enjoy the music. The conflict is real.

Regardless of where you stand, there is no denying AI music is here to stay.





 
I haven't heard that much AI music. I listened to your first track, it's alright, but the vocals lack emotion. Will we hear songs with vocals like Marvin Gaye, Let's Get It ON or Adell, Set Fire To The Rain? There's infinite example but you probably get what I mean.

I know very little about it, I wonder who would get royalties or credit, etc.?
 
I liked the story about a guy who created AI music, uploaded it to a streaming service, created AI bots to "listen" to it, and then collected the revenue generated from the listens.
 
Mike said:
I am unsure where I stand on this issue. On one hand, I know it’s not real. On the other hand, I enjoy the music. The conflict is real.

Regardless of where you stand, there is no denying AI music is here to stay.





Click to expand...


Are you sure this music was made by IA ? :eek:

I thought that in the not-too-distant future, only art would distinguish us from AI and be the fingerprint of our humanity... But not even art? look at those strange yet magnificent videos...





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZIohbVfCK4&list=RDj7CdI49_CnM&index=5
 
It’s fascinating to me.

I remember discussions about sorta this type of thing when synthesizers became popular way back. The shock that something else (fake synth) could sound like a violin etc.

To me if you enjoy it - what difference does it make? To me, AI music has yet to have the emotion. But I’m sure that’s just a matter of time.

Yes, it obviously hurts the artists out there. And I feel for them. However. Computers in their whole existence have cost people in various industries their jobs as time goes on. And also they have created jobs in IT.

The whole tech conundrum continues.
 
Mike said:




Click to expand...

I listened again the videos that Mike posted and realized what was strange about them: the music sound so familiar that I could almost swear I'd heard it somewhere before. And I found myself thinking that perhaps that's the limitation of AI: the inability to create something truly new and disruptive. AI "builds" on what it knows, on what already exists in databases. And that leaves space for true artists, for true creatives...
 
Even though I am a retired software engineer and have spent many a year deep in tech, computers, coding, data, etc., I am not a fan of AI. There are parts that can be used as a very good thing, but typical of humans, we find ways of corrupting and using new tech for not so great of purposes.

I have always believed that really good music takes incredible artistry and can touch your soul. AI is great at copying and expanding a bit from there. But the level of artistry that a great musician has is simply not AI's forte.

I would say much of what we see is the type of music being listened to. Electronic beats and simple tunes (i.e. a lot of the current pop/hip hop scene) can probably be done by AI.

There is a call to require anything generated by AI to be labeled as such. I 100% support this requirement.

I will always prefer music that is created by artist who have dedicated their lives to their craft. Dedicated their lives to music.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top