metaphacts
New member
..Whats also pretty obvious , is how reviewers and the sort have a real credibility issue among current audiophiles ..
sadly so .....
I don't think this is new at all. Audiophiles have lined up behind a favorite (or favorites) as long as I can remember, at least since J Gordon Holt shook up the audio publication world way back when. Perhaps it seems more acute today due to the fact that things play out on the internet in hours rather than through the mail and over days and months.
There are many very good and thorough reviewers out there today. Some, as with MC and numerous others, have been at this for more than 30 years and have developed a strong following. Perhaps with all the internet noise today, it can take longer to get a handle on some of the newer guys, but they are certainly out there too. It's up to the reader to sort his/her personal wheat from his/her chaff.
I have a philosophy for reviews I adopted long ago: A review is a request for the reviewer to express his/her opinion on a product. Unless there is a factual error in the review (which publications give an opportunity to correct), it would be rude to tell someone from whom you have asked an opinion that their subjective opinion is wrong.
ymmv