It is ignorant to suggest that all class D amplifiers sound the same. Just as it would be ignorant to suggest that all class A amplifiers are amazing sounding. Amplifier class of operation does not have much of anything to do with the sound. A talented designer can achieve the same sound regardless of amplifier class. Bruno Putzeys has designed class A amplifiers, and class D amplifiers, and as he says, amplifiers do not sound good (or bad) because they are class D.
One of the best systems I have ever heard, just happened to have a pair of class D amplifiers, driving Vivid Audio Giya speakers... I have heard most of the famous class A and A/B amps, PASS, Constellation, Big VTLs and ARCs, Soulution, Vitus etc, etc. There is nothing missing with the best of the latest generation of class D amplifiers (except noise and distortions). Different amps sound different from each other. But anyone who decides how amps sound by their class of operation, these days, is stuck in the past and telegraphing their responses.
I am happy not to have to deal with ancient, wasteful, distorted, overly large and heavy amplifiers of the past, and embrace the technology and work of really smart designers like Mr. Putzeys.
Although I am not a fan of blind listening tests in general, I would suggest that those who feel like the best class D amps of today do not measure up, do a blind comparison of the Mola Molas vs. the Solid State amplifier of their choice at the same price, as their is clearly a case of some kind of bias going on here.
This reminds of all the other audiophile myths I have been trying to overcome in my own thinking: feedback is bad, IC Opamps are always worse than discrete circuits, analog is better than digital, etc.