SoundRebels
Active member
- Thread Author
- #1
Western Electric 91 E just arrived ...
- Thread starter SoundRebels
- Start date
Nikhil
Active member
Absolutely stunning!
.
.
CPP
Active member
unreal, nice
stereogeek
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2018
- Messages
- 480
I don't usually get excited about integrateds but this thing is really bad ass. How cool would it be to have the tubes retract inside the case and extend up with a switch on the remote?
Jerome W
Active member
Hello folks,
Thinking about buying this amp to try on my modified JBL Olympus S8r.
Who owns it here ? Which speakers do you use ? Which Output Transformer Impedance did you choose ?
Thanks a lot !
Thinking about buying this amp to try on my modified JBL Olympus S8r.
Who owns it here ? Which speakers do you use ? Which Output Transformer Impedance did you choose ?
Thanks a lot !
I look at this amp in a very different light than all of you.
Anyone see a problem here?
VS
www.westernelectric.com
See the problem? If you do this to your dealers who have bought demo product and have been selling your product for a few years and then you do this?
Speaks volumes.
Anyone see a problem here?
VS
91 E — Western Electric - Maker of electron tubes and high fidelity
www.westernelectric.com
See the problem? If you do this to your dealers who have bought demo product and have been selling your product for a few years and then you do this?
Speaks volumes.
mep
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 5,324
I look at this amp in a very different light than all of you.
Anyone see a problem here?
VS
91 E — Western Electric - Maker of electron tubes and high fidelity
See the problem? If you do this to your dealers who have bought demo product and have been selling your product for a few years and then you do this?
Speaks volumes.
Yikes!
Jerome W
Active member
Hello Mike,
I admit that the new price is what tempted me actually.
For sure it is very hard and unfair to the dealers who paid the original price before WE went “direct”.
WE must be desperate to do this.
I admit that the new price is what tempted me actually.
For sure it is very hard and unfair to the dealers who paid the original price before WE went “direct”.
WE must be desperate to do this.
Bones13
Active member
They also want to sell the expensive 300b tubes.
“ don’t sell razors, sell razor blades…”
“ don’t sell razors, sell razor blades…”
Michaels HiFi
Well-known member
I will say their current production 300B's are pretty fantastic.
Porsche
Active member
I look at this amp in a very different light than all of you.
Anyone see a problem here?
VS
91 E — Western Electric - Maker of electron tubes and high fidelity
See the problem? If you do this to your dealers who have bought demo product and have been selling your product for a few years and then you do this?
Speaks volumes.
such bs, let legit dealers build the product line, get them out in the field and sell to anyone else who can ride on there hard work of building the product lineI look at this amp in a very different light than all of you.
Anyone see a problem here?
VS
91 E — Western Electric - Maker of electron tubes and high fidelity
See the problem? If you do this to your dealers who have bought demo product and have been selling your product for a few years and then you do this?
Speaks volumes.
mep
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 5,324
Ditto. Don't sell printers, sell ink cartridges.
atmasphere
Active member
It does.I look at this amp in a very different light than all of you.
Anyone see a problem here?
VS
91 E — Western Electric - Maker of electron tubes and high fidelity
See the problem? If you do this to your dealers who have bought demo product and have been selling your product for a few years and then you do this?
Speaks volumes.
Western Electric developed the 'parafeed' (parallel feed) SET technology to get around the bass problem all SETs have when using a gapped output transformer. This is an example of a parafeed amp and really is the way to do it if you want to use an SET.
Normally a parafeed SET is less expensive than the traditional counterparts since the output transformer and in this case, Constant Current Source as a plate load, are so much less expensive.
Apparently they thought that the use of a Constant Current Source (CCS) instead of a choke plate load was patent-able, and the USPTO agreed, as best I can make out because they didn't search enough to find out that sort of thing has been understood for quite some time. Perhaps there is a nuance I'm missing...