Caelin, I understand the benefit of acronyms, having worked quite a long time in telecoms. My comment was sarcastic only to the extent to which acronyms are not meaningful. If a cryptic abbreviation must be used to make talking about a simple thing more interesting, power to you.
You just said it yourself, the Triton v2 grounding magic you praised and so elaborately filled with acronyms does not solve grounding issues. Some yes, others not. And I was talking about Nordost passive grounding. Did not want to pin it on your nose, but you asked.
My enquiry about the Triton arises from the fact that I saw a big box full of nothing on your stand in Munich. Peeking inside a Niagara is definitely more interesting.
Btw, IMHO an answer ‘read a book’ to someone who owns 10-15K worth of your products is an extremely weak one. But that’s just me.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I respectfully disagree. Reading materials that provide basic information about a subject is not disrespectful. And I certainly don't know what level your technical understanding is at. It may be well beyond the material I referenced. Furthermore, when I give you an answer on a forum it is not just for your specific benefit. It is for the many lurkers that don't have your level of understanding. Additionally, I did go on to answer your questions specifically. So don't take it as a insult because it is not meant that way.
JFYI, I have both the Niagra 7000 and the Niagra 5000. There are many approaches to solve an engineering problem. We have been making power distributors since the year 2000 with a modicum of success. We believe in a simple, non-reactance approach to power delivery. There are other more conventional approaches that have multiple stages of filtering and complexity. I prefer to let the performance of our products speak for themselves.