To jab or not to jab

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your 'fact' about the hospital admin staff gaming the system with Covid--we are still waiting to see the proof from you, of this 'fact'.
Your theories are far from facts. Facts have clearly observable proof behind them, none of which you have supplied so far...which is in fact speaking for itself:hey:

While your tone is very condescending, I will reply but will ignore your posts if it continues. I have already stated that I only post that which I am sure of. Stop being naïve, there are billions of dollars involved with Medicare Fraud and Abuse annually. There are Medicare task forces that arrest people for it. 2020 was no different and some will pay for it when they catch up with them.

"Given this 20 percent increase in payment associated with the COVID-19 diagnosis for hospitalized Medicare patients, there has been speculation that this “windfall” is incentivizing fraudulent behavior. Headlines have claimed that because hospitals are getting paid more for patients if they include a COVID-19 diagnosis on the patient’s chart, and are paid even more for each COVID-19 patient on a ventilator, some hospitals are adding the COVID-19 diagnosis to the charts of patients who do not actually have COVID-19.



Also...

When it comes to the $100 billion fund to help providers, future grants by HHS are supposed to focus on providers in areas hit hard by the outbreak, among others. But the initial allocation of $30 billion from that $100 billion fund to assist hospitals wasn’t distributed in that way. Instead, it was based on prior Medicare business.

A Kaiser Health News analysis found that the distribution of that initial $30 billion resulted in hospitals in states less affected by the pandemic — such as Minnesota, Nebraska and Montana — being given funding that worked out to be about “$300,000 per reported COVID-19 case.” In New York, which has the highest number of COVID-19 cases, the grant money amounted to “only $12,000 per case.”


Also...

"Many health-care companies and hospital industry groups are fighting a Trump administration policy tying extra federal coronavirus reimbursements to test results proving that patients are positive for Covid-19, saying the requirement unfairly deprives them of relief money established by Congress.

Legislation in March provided hospitals a 20% boost to the standard federal Medicare reimbursement for each patient admitted for coronavirus.

But the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services added a requirement, which took effect Sept. 1: For hospitals to receive the funding, each patient must have a documented positive Covid-19 lab test.

CMS officials said the requirement was added to protect against fraud since the funding was increased. “As part of Medicare’s longstanding standard payment policies, Medicare providers are required to accurately document and bill for services provided based on a beneficiary’s diagnosis,” a spokesman said.

CMS is concerned that without a lab test showing someone has Covid-19, hospitals may code them incorrectly as having the virus and erroneously receive the 20% add-on. The agency said that it will review patient records after payments are made to confirm positive test results, and those lacking results would see their payments accounted for as overpayments."
 
While your tone is very condescending, I will reply but will ignore your posts if it continues. I have already stated that I only post that which I am sure of. Stop being naïve, there are billions of dollars involved with Medicare Fraud and Abuse annually. There are Medicare task forces that arrest people for it. 2020 was no different and some will pay for it when they catch up with them.

"Given this 20 percent increase in payment associated with the COVID-19 diagnosis for hospitalized Medicare patients, there has been speculation that this “windfall” is incentivizing fraudulent behavior. Headlines have claimed that because hospitals are getting paid more for patients if they include a COVID-19 diagnosis on the patient’s chart, and are paid even more for each COVID-19 patient on a ventilator, some hospitals are adding the COVID-19 diagnosis to the charts of patients who do not actually have COVID-19.



Also...

When it comes to the $100 billion fund to help providers, future grants by HHS are supposed to focus on providers in areas hit hard by the outbreak, among others. But the initial allocation of $30 billion from that $100 billion fund to assist hospitals wasn’t distributed in that way. Instead, it was based on prior Medicare business.

A Kaiser Health News analysis found that the distribution of that initial $30 billion resulted in hospitals in states less affected by the pandemic — such as Minnesota, Nebraska and Montana — being given funding that worked out to be about “$300,000 per reported COVID-19 case.” In New York, which has the highest number of COVID-19 cases, the grant money amounted to “only $12,000 per case.”


Also...

"Many health-care companies and hospital industry groups are fighting a Trump administration policy tying extra federal coronavirus reimbursements to test results proving that patients are positive for Covid-19, saying the requirement unfairly deprives them of relief money established by Congress.

Legislation in March provided hospitals a 20% boost to the standard federal Medicare reimbursement for each patient admitted for coronavirus.

But the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services added a requirement, which took effect Sept. 1: For hospitals to receive the funding, each patient must have a documented positive Covid-19 lab test.

CMS officials said the requirement was added to protect against fraud since the funding was increased. “As part of Medicare’s longstanding standard payment policies, Medicare providers are required to accurately document and bill for services provided based on a beneficiary’s diagnosis,” a spokesman said.

CMS is concerned that without a lab test showing someone has Covid-19, hospitals may code them incorrectly as having the virus and erroneously receive the 20% add-on. The agency said that it will review patient records after payments are made to confirm positive test results, and those lacking results would see their payments accounted for as overpayments."

Like I stated before, the web is a dangerous place. All that you posted above is interesting, and all of it is irrelevant to supplying the 'proof' that one would need to actually indict the people whom you are so sure are gaming the system. Is it possible that this is occurring...sure anything is possible, but your theory is exactly that, nothing but a theory. Your facts are missing here, as are your facts about the other conspiracies that you allude to.
As to a condescending tone..well I do not believe I was the one who posted this: "I only post that which is true"and "some people have to deal with reality and facts whether they like it or not".
 
Rauch suspects that there may have been an uptick in post-vaccine hearing loss symptoms among people with pre-existing inner ear disease — such as Meniere’s disease, autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) and vestibular migraine — especially after the second dose. Though, he cautioned that his view is anecdotal.

Said Rauch: “These effects seem to occur within the first two weeks post-injection and sometimes within just a few days. They appear to be temporary. The actual likelihood of this phenomenon and its clinical course are not well-defined — it’s just too soon to know.”
 
Like I stated before, the web is a dangerous place. All that you posted above is interesting, and all of it is irrelevant to supplying the 'proof' that one would need to actually indite the people whom you are so sure are gaming the system. Is it possible that this is occurring...sure anything is possible, but your theory is exactly that, nothing but a theory. Your facts are missing here, as are your facts about the other conspiracies that you allude to.
As to a condescending tone..well I do not believe I was the one who posted this: "I only post that which is true"and "some people have to deal with reality and facts whether they like it or not".

Can you not be satisfied with words from the horse's mouth? Medicare themselves? Why are they concerned with COVID fraud and made specific requirements for the COVID diagnosis to be backed up by actual lab tests? Who are they implying is gaming them?
 
One of the largest health care fraud schemes investigated by the FBI and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG) and prosecuted by the Department of Justice resulted in charges against 24 defendants, including the CEOs, COOs and others associated with five telemedicine companies, the owners of dozens of durable medical equipment (DME) companies and three licensed medical professionals, for their alleged participation in health care fraud schemes involving more than $1.2 billion in loss, as well as the execution of over 80 search warrants in 17 federal districts. In addition, the Center for Medicare Services, Center for Program Integrity (CMS/CPI) announced today that it took adverse administrative action against 130 DME companies that had submitted over $1.7 billion in claims and were paid over $900 million.


Federal Indictments & Law Enforcement Actions in One of the Largest Health Care Fraud Schemes Involving Telemedicine and Durable Medical Equipment Marketing Executives Results in Charges Against 24 Individuals Responsible for Over $1.2 Billion in Losses | OPA | Department of Justice
 
COVID-19_Survey_Scams_Infographic-600x600.png
 
Serge - your post 121 is speculation only - you may believe it to be true BUT that does not make it a fact. 1+1= 2 is an irrefutable fact - demonstrable - nothing you have stated in 121 has any irrefutable data to validate the speculation - I wish you well.
 
Serge - your post 121 is speculation only - you may believe it to be true BUT that does not make it a fact. 1+1= 2 is an irrefutable fact - demonstrable - nothing you have stated in 121 has any irrefutable data to validate the speculation - I wish you well.

Thank you.
 
Serge - your post 121 is speculation only - you may believe it to be true BUT that does not make it a fact. 1+1= 2 is an irrefutable fact - demonstrable - nothing you have stated in 121 has any irrefutable data to validate the speculation - I wish you well.

Then it is speculation on Medicare's part. They are the ones that require an actual covid lab test in order to pay the hospital a premium. Having been involved with medical businesses and billing practices, I am informed on this topic. Medicare typically makes "reactive" changes, not proactive when they make policy changes such as the one we are discussing here. Yes, big surprise that private entity hospitals would be suspect of up-charging Medicare... This is getting old. Is there a point here?
 
Justice Department Recovers Over $2.8 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2018

The Department of Justice obtained more than $2.8 billion in settlements and judgments from civil cases involving fraud and false claims against the government in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2018, Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Jesse Panuccio and Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division announced today. Recoveries since 1986, when Congress substantially strengthened the civil False Claims Act, now total more than $59 billion.
 
Then it is speculation on Medicare's part. They are the ones that require an actual covid lab test in order to pay the hospital a premium. Having been involved with medical businesses and billing practices, I am informed on this topic. Medicare typically makes "reactive" changes, not proactive when they make policy changes such as the one we are discussing here. Yes, big surprise that private entity hospitals would be suspect of up-charging Medicare... This is getting old. Is there a point here?
Yes, there is a point here...and it's this: you persist on and on with points that are irrelevant. Which now leads me to my point, have a nice day and I too wish you well!
 
Yes, there is a point here...and it's this: you persist on and on with points that are irrelevant. Which now leads me to my point, have a nice day and I too wish you well!

Ok, you are done with replies from me. You have a great day as well..
 
Pfizer launches trial to test Covid vaccine in children as young as 6 months

The trial, along with similar studies that Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and others are conducting, aims to guide how the shots should be administered to young children, who are not thought to be the most vulnerable to Covid-19 but can be infected and spread the virus.


Pfizer launches pediatric trial to test Covid vaccine in children
 
Bill Gates this and Bill Gates that and all I could think about is if he were an audiophile, what his system(s) would be like.

Oh wait, if he were an audiophile, he would be scheming to depopulate the audiophiles. Never mind. We definitely don’t want that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top