Feanor
Active member
- Thread Author
- #1
Of interest to the "two tribes", both subjectivists and objectivists alike ... or it should be.
Speech by Lars Risbos, cofounder of PURIFI: Unreasonable Audio Innovation
This quote excerpted from Lars Risbos' speech ...
Another quote from Lars Risbos' speech ...
Speech by Lars Risbos, cofounder of PURIFI: Unreasonable Audio Innovation
This quote excerpted from Lars Risbos' speech ...
The objectivists tribe: standard metrics are sufficient, double-blind testing is the only admissible evidence, and almost nothing is audible. And yet — paradoxically — they spend enormous effort optimising the same short list of metrics: THD, IMD, noise floor. Decade after decade. Regardless of whether those metrics capture what the ear is actually sensitive to.
Another quote from Lars Risbos' speech ...
Audio is not art and it is not science. It is engineering. That distinction matters because it changes how you decide what to do.
In engineering, you design your measurements for the specific failure modes of the specific device. You look hard for bad news. You take results seriously even when — especially when — they don’t fit the consensus.