You'll find it's a group of about 10-15 of them who are on all the forums. Many use the same names. There is no escaping them nor what they want the forums to be like. They are the smaller number of people but the biggest voices. It's always their way or the highway. No differing thought or opinion is allowed.I’m beginning to wonder at some posts I’ve seen, esp. by new members. Perhaps I’ve misjudged this place.
I think SM has changed the game and will continue to do so. The press has a role but IMO they have gone from review based to being reporters. That's fine but the shift has become very obvious as there is IMO no consistent point of view and that everything is good and that allows for more advertising revenue.Well said. I sincerely wish all of you would create topics. My day to day is so wrapped up in the minutia of the business from manufacturing to distribution to retail to trade show planning, that I don’t want to make topics all about me, my brands etc. That would get boring even for me! I’m more interested in what you guys are seeing, reading about, find interesting - audio related or not.
The other forum has basically the same topics over and over again with continual one upmanship from the same 20 guys. Man, that gets old fast.
Here’s a topic idea: in 2026, how are you, the consumer, procuring information about new products? I’ve seen a fundamental shift since Covid. In speaking with thousands of consumers since Covid, when they call or come into the store, they start out by telling me where they heard about a product. This source is fundamentally different than it was before Covid.
Has YouTube been your go to? Online magazines? Print magazines? Facebook? Instagram? Forums? Shows? Your trusted dealer?
I like how you summed it up on "Reference"I think SM has changed the game and will continue to do so. The press has a role but IMO they have gone from review based to being reporters. That's fine but the shift has become very obvious as there is IMO no consistent point of view and that everything is good and that allows for more advertising revenue.
If everyone has a different reference than there is none
Sincere question: If everyone hears differently and has different rooms to deal with, how can there be one reference and who decides what that one should be and based on what?If everyone has a different reference than there is none
that's an easy question. What exactly is the goal of an audio system?Sincere question: If everyone hears differently and has different rooms to deal with, how can there be one reference and who decides what that one should be and based on what?
Meant in the spirit of conversation: I personally think the entire concept of a reviewer for audio is a broken concept.that's an easy question. What exactly is the goal of an audio system?
Everyone does not hear differently but many do not know how to listen, very different.
If its just whatever you like then this is what we have.
The Absolute Sound and the Stereophile started out with well defined goals.
HP was my mentor and he was looking for the sound of unamplified instruments in an acoustic space. This is how I was taught.
You may disagree and that's perfectly fine but what is your goal?
These are "reviewers" no? How does one review without a goal or a target?
If we have four targets then we don't have one goal do we?
well you are making my point.Meant in the spirit of conversation: I personally think the entire concept of a reviewer for audio is a broken concept.
To have someone tell me what they hear (different than me) in their room (different than mine) with their gear (different than mine) with goals (different than mine) contributes nothing of any sort of value to someone looking for guidance to purchase gear (in my personal opinion). It holds as much weight and credibility (IMO) as any random person on a forum or Facebook page.
Instead these should be viewed as simple entertainment and fun to read or watch pieces. Actual value or weight given to the reviews should be no more than any random posting.
Again - just my personal opinions. I get move value out of talking with my audio buddies who I know hear like me and look for the same things than any official "review".
I have found it increasingly difficult to find useful and honest advice regarding new products and technology long before Covid, though I'm sure Covid has made matters worse.Well said. I sincerely wish all of you would create topics. My day to day is so wrapped up in the minutia of the business from manufacturing to distribution to retail to trade show planning, that I don’t want to make topics all about me, my brands etc. That would get boring even for me! I’m more interested in what you guys are seeing, reading about, find interesting - audio related or not.
The other forum has basically the same topics over and over again with continual one upmanship from the same 20 guys. Man, that gets old fast.
Here’s a topic idea: in 2026, how are you, the consumer, procuring information about new products? I’ve seen a fundamental shift since Covid. In speaking with thousands of consumers since Covid, when they call or come into the store, they start out by telling me where they heard about a product. This source is fundamentally different than it was before Covid.
Has YouTube been your go to? Online magazines? Print magazines? Facebook? Instagram? Forums? Shows? Your trusted dealer?
Thanks Elliot for explaining.well you are making my point.
HP took us on a journey, he did comparisons, he talked about music, recordings etc. Today its just reporting a bunch of marketing and lately talking about the great food and trips they went on.
It is what it is but one thing for sure IMO its not being a critic.
If we examine one major publication they have large panel speakers as a reference, Omni directional 4 piece system as a reference, large horns with multi subs as a reference and large dynamic cone speakers as a reference from their four main reporters. This is interesting as I am sure that the four have probably not heard each others systems, they are all "reference" and as we all know they are all very different.
So how can they all be a reference? reference to what?