Tariff implications.........

As that is true - it’s also true that the DOW is up marginally from Election Day in November.

Markets short term are deceptive. Plus a trillion minus a trillion. ?????
Yes- absolutely!!

It helps that Trump blinked again- twice this week alone. Apparently he found (without admitting it) that he didn't hold all the cards, that China has other markets than just us. Right now the market seems to be counting on Trump to have learned his lesson (part of which is to not threaten the Fed). My surmise, one that I am not willing to bet on, is that things won't really be stable in the market again until Trump figures out how bad an influence Navarro actually is.

At lot of support of Trump during the election came from the agricultural sector. Right now due to the loss of overseas markets, many farmers don't have a good idea of what to plant. Some are selling off their seeds and equipment, although buyers are scarce. We went through this in 1.0 as well; the book 'Death by China' having been introduced to the Trump administration back then. Only thing is now its worse, because the agriculture sector hasn't recovered from last time and now its happening again.
 
From Auralic's US website:

Due to US government tariff policy, we have temporarily suspended all shipment to US address till future notice.
This is common. With customer agreement, we are holding some shipments too. If customers don’t agree, we pay the tariff and suffer. Stuff ordered 6-8 weeks ago is hammering us. Our vendors have been awesome to work with and we are sharing the pain equally. Just got absolutely clobbered on a Ictra rack from Germany.

I should rename Luxury HiFi Distribution - European Sound of America!
 
Yea, the number one educational and research institution in the world. They are only a disgrace in your eyes because they refuses to bow down to a madman.

I am very proud of my niece who is a Clinical Psychiatrist at Harvard Medical. The number medical research organization in the world. They have made more medical breakthroughs than the rest of the world combined.
Yet between Harvard and the whole Medical Industrial Complex, after 170 years none of them has found a cure for anything unless they have hidden them.
 
Yet between Harvard and the whole Medical Industrial Complex, after 170 years none of them has found a cure for anything unless they have hidden them.
I share your apparent frustration with the American medical system.

But your statement is false. My surmise is you may not have been keeping up with all the advances in medical work. I know for sure I haven't!! But here is an example I discovered recently. If you are older, like me you might find this interesting.

Knees are often a problem for older folks. A friend of mine just had both knees replaced since he was bone on bone. But the FDA did approve a treatment for artificial miniscus replacement that is far less invasive. The procedure is similar to an arthroscopy but replacements for the two minicus structures are installed instead.

Now if you're referring to the American medial system IMO its really messed! IMO/IME that has nothing to do with research or medical advances/cures, and everything to do with how fees are charged and the like. If you go to some smaller countries like Thailand or Costa Rica you find out how good (and inexpensive) their systems are compared to ours. I'm convinced this has to do with how our insurance is set up and knowing that, provider organizations will automatically pad their invoices with additional charges. I say that out of several direct experiences...
 
Yet between Harvard and the whole Medical Industrial Complex, after 170 years none of them has found a cure for anything unless they have hidden them.
Not a single cure, really? Is that what your sources are telling you??
Life expectancy has risen from 40 years in 1800 to 78.7 years today. But I am sure that medical research had nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

In regards to Harvard, in case you care about reality and real facts, here you go:
 
Last edited:
Somehow the media is mostly ignoring the strength of the dollar discussion and that’s as important to prices as the tariffs.

How does that play into it?
 
Can you name some of them? A pill is not a Cure. Knee or Meniscus replacement is not a Cure.
Well, I guess that the eradication of something like smallpox, which is first on the list I sent you, doesn't count (OMG, did I mention a vaccine). Let me guess; anything short of live-forever is less than a cure in your world? This is semantic BS. In the meantime, I would be happy to replace my aging knees as opposed to waiting for them to never age.
 
Last edited:
Well, I guess that the eradication of something like smallpox, which is first on the list I sent you, doesn't count (OMG, did I mention a vaccine). Let me guess; anything short of live-forever is less than a cure in your world? This is semantic BS. In the meantime, I would be happy to replace my aging knees as opposed to waiting for them to never age.
As some one who did replace both knees I can attest to what a medical break through.
 
Total joint replacement was my medical specialty. There have been several acute diseases that have been "cured" through the use of Vaccines, and Antibiotics. An interesting anecdote that I heard once. It was not until World War II that you had a better than 50/50 chance of medical improvement by seeking medical advice. It was penicillin that made that happen. Disease disappearance has prompted people to back off of some vaccinations, and we are seeing re-appearance of measles. I truly hope that we got rid of smallpox and polio though. Even "the plague" and syphilis, another couple of early scourges of civilization are very amenable to treatment with antibiotics.

From my specialty, the mechanical and biological changes of the bones, cartilages, and ligaments during the arthritic process is very severe by the time one submits to getting a joint replacement. There are no stem cells to inject that can instruct the bone to restructure to normal shape and consistency. Cartilage can be regrown slowly, and we can do "spot" repairs of articular cartilage after injuries, as we can replace the meniscus after acute injury, where the rest of the knee is still normal. They are even 3-D printing the collagen scaffolding of a meniscus and putting the patient's own stem cells into this scaffolding before implantation. (still mostly in research I think) This research continues apace.

Current science still offers artificial total joint replacement for end stage arthritis, that has improved greatly since the '60s, when it started. And, over time, the costs did fall. My reimbursement (purchasing value received) for a total hip replacement fell 75% over the first 25 years of my practice. If fell low enough to drive total joint patients to specialists, and the casual joint surgeon found more lucrative things to do. I know of several of my patients whose artificial joints lasted 30 years. Many more than the 10 years or so that was the common number back then to tell a patient. We also started putting total joints in younger patients. My anecdote was the 50 year old man with knee arthritis from an injury in his early life. With severe arthritis, he might have been told to wait until he was 65 to get surgery. However, that 50 year old was in the prime of his life and career, and was being asked to give that up. We started doing the surgery at age 50, get them through life. The patient had to understand that they would need a revision sometime down the line. I can't count the number of times I heard "Thanks Doc, you gave me my life back." Of course many times that came from a retired individual that was able to get back to golf with friends.

On the other hand, I had my ACL replaced in 1992, and my knee survived 4 marathons, and several small triathlons. Sure, I have some mild arthritis now, and don't run anymore, but that is because I lost my medial meniscus in 1990, back when they did not have the ability to repair or replace a meniscus. So there has been a lot of improvement over my lifetime.

Now the chronic disease epidemic, currently not cured, is another cesspool that I will not address. That is a much too political a topic for me to want to address. But I know at least some of the successes of modern medicine.
 
Total joint replacement was my medical specialty. There have been several acute diseases that have been "cured" through the use of Vaccines, and Antibiotics. An interesting anecdote that I heard once. It was not until World War II that you had a better than 50/50 chance of medical improvement by seeking medical advice. It was penicillin that made that happen. Disease disappearance has prompted people to back off of some vaccinations, and we are seeing re-appearance of measles. I truly hope that we got rid of smallpox and polio though. Even "the plague" and syphilis, another couple of early scourges of civilization are very amenable to treatment with antibiotics.

From my specialty, the mechanical and biological changes of the bones, cartilages, and ligaments during the arthritic process is very severe by the time one submits to getting a joint replacement. There are no stem cells to inject that can instruct the bone to restructure to normal shape and consistency. Cartilage can be regrown slowly, and we can do "spot" repairs of articular cartilage after injuries, as we can replace the meniscus after acute injury, where the rest of the knee is still normal. They are even 3-D printing the collagen scaffolding of a meniscus and putting the patient's own stem cells into this scaffolding before implantation. (still mostly in research I think) This research continues apace.

Current science still offers artificial total joint replacement for end stage arthritis, that has improved greatly since the '60s, when it started. And, over time, the costs did fall. My reimbursement (purchasing value received) for a total hip replacement fell 75% over the first 25 years of my practice. If fell low enough to drive total joint patients to specialists, and the casual joint surgeon found more lucrative things to do. I know of several of my patients whose artificial joints lasted 30 years. Many more than the 10 years or so that was the common number back then to tell a patient. We also started putting total joints in younger patients. My anecdote was the 50 year old man with knee arthritis from an injury in his early life. With severe arthritis, he might have been told to wait until he was 65 to get surgery. However, that 50 year old was in the prime of his life and career, and was being asked to give that up. We started doing the surgery at age 50, get them through life. The patient had to understand that they would need a revision sometime down the line. I can't count the number of times I heard "Thanks Doc, you gave me my life back." Of course many times that came from a retired individual that was able to get back to golf with friends.

On the other hand, I had my ACL replaced in 1992, and my knee survived 4 marathons, and several small triathlons. Sure, I have some mild arthritis now, and don't run anymore, but that is because I lost my medial meniscus in 1990, back when they did not have the ability to repair or replace a meniscus. So there has been a lot of improvement over my lifetime.

Now the chronic disease epidemic, currently not cured, is another cesspool that I will not address. That is a much too political a topic for me to want to address. But I know at least some of the successes of modern medicine.

Pretty much everything on this thread is political. The train left the tracks as soon as the thread started because by design, it was doomed to derail.
 
Total joint replacement was my medical specialty. There have been several acute diseases that have been "cured" through the use of Vaccines, and Antibiotics. An interesting anecdote that I heard once. It was not until World War II that you had a better than 50/50 chance of medical improvement by seeking medical advice. It was penicillin that made that happen. Disease disappearance has prompted people to back off of some vaccinations, and we are seeing re-appearance of measles. I truly hope that we got rid of smallpox and polio though. Even "the plague" and syphilis, another couple of early scourges of civilization are very amenable to treatment with antibiotics.

From my specialty, the mechanical and biological changes of the bones, cartilages, and ligaments during the arthritic process is very severe by the time one submits to getting a joint replacement. There are no stem cells to inject that can instruct the bone to restructure to normal shape and consistency. Cartilage can be regrown slowly, and we can do "spot" repairs of articular cartilage after injuries, as we can replace the meniscus after acute injury, where the rest of the knee is still normal. They are even 3-D printing the collagen scaffolding of a meniscus and putting the patient's own stem cells into this scaffolding before implantation. (still mostly in research I think) This research continues apace.

Current science still offers artificial total joint replacement for end stage arthritis, that has improved greatly since the '60s, when it started. And, over time, the costs did fall. My reimbursement (purchasing value received) for a total hip replacement fell 75% over the first 25 years of my practice. If fell low enough to drive total joint patients to specialists, and the casual joint surgeon found more lucrative things to do. I know of several of my patients whose artificial joints lasted 30 years. Many more than the 10 years or so that was the common number back then to tell a patient. We also started putting total joints in younger patients. My anecdote was the 50 year old man with knee arthritis from an injury in his early life. With severe arthritis, he might have been told to wait until he was 65 to get surgery. However, that 50 year old was in the prime of his life and career, and was being asked to give that up. We started doing the surgery at age 50, get them through life. The patient had to understand that they would need a revision sometime down the line. I can't count the number of times I heard "Thanks Doc, you gave me my life back." Of course many times that came from a retired individual that was able to get back to golf with friends.

On the other hand, I had my ACL replaced in 1992, and my knee survived 4 marathons, and several small triathlons. Sure, I have some mild arthritis now, and don't run anymore, but that is because I lost my medial meniscus in 1990, back when they did not have the ability to repair or replace a meniscus. So there has been a lot of improvement over my lifetime.

Now the chronic disease epidemic, currently not cured, is another cesspool that I will not address. That is a much too political a topic for me to want to address. But I know at least some of the successes of modern medicine.
Thank you for the excellent explanation and descriptions Bones. My point, which I am fairly certain you showed or proved, is that there have been incredible advancements in medical fields. Yes, some cures, and many vaccines that actually have saved hundreds of thousands of lives, and advancements in medical practices and procedures. What used to be major surgeries can now be done through laparoscopic surgeries and the patient going home in a day or two... gallbladder removal for example.

These advancements and others come from science and research. Most of this is done at medical universities of which Harvard would be consider one of if not the absolutely leader in the field.

It is like when I hear some one complaining about how much they hate science and geeks, saying they are ruining the world, etc., as they are driving their brand new fancy pickup truck, talking on their new cellphone, and walking around on their replaced knees and hip, looking up something on Google (the Internet) from that cellphone. Where the heck do they think all of these major advancements come from?

I remember when there wasn't cellphones, when no one heard about or even dreamed about the Internet, how cellphones used to be, mounted in your car or in a pack that you had to carry over your shoulder. My wife was Verizon's very first customer in California (and she still has that same phone number), and she had to carry this crazy ass thing around with her. Advancements come from the scientist, the researchers. Period... full stop...

I worked at Vandenberg designing software to launch rockets putting up satellites which aided in all of these things, and most importantly, our national security. This was pure science fiction when I was a kid. And scientist made it happen.
 
Last edited:
The amount of improvements and "cures" discovered through research in the past 170 years is absolutely staggering.
I used to work for a big US pharmaceutical company, finished my school at a university and did research at academical hospitals.

It are the pharmaceutical company‘s who produce the cures, not the universities. The latter do mainly fundamental research and if they find something promising, they cannot scale it up, and they have not the capacity to test it on humans and get approval from the FDA and EMEA.

Universities do a great job, without fundamental kwowledge the pharma cannot make a medicine against it.
 
Back
Top