cmalak
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 2,304
- Thread Author
- #1
Guys,
Maybe it's me and I am not getting it but I just listened on Spotify to Shelby Lynne's Just a Little Lovin' which is supposed to be this great audiophile album that everyone has raved about in all the mags and is played constantly at audio shows, and apart from being a better recording than many of the covers she does of Dusty Springfield's songs, musically I find it boring and, even though I don't listen to Dusty Springfield's music much, I just put on Dusty in Memphis, and from a music standpoint, ten times out of ten, I will chose the original Dusty songs over Shelby Lynne's covers in Just a Little Lovin'.
Am I missing something. The Shelby renditions are boring, the arrangements are meandering and take themselves too seriously and just put me to sleep boring. The Dusty originals are scored with big band arrangements, have wider dynamic envelopes, are faster paced generally-speaking and just generally more engaging.
Don't get what all the fuss is about.
Maybe it's me and I am not getting it but I just listened on Spotify to Shelby Lynne's Just a Little Lovin' which is supposed to be this great audiophile album that everyone has raved about in all the mags and is played constantly at audio shows, and apart from being a better recording than many of the covers she does of Dusty Springfield's songs, musically I find it boring and, even though I don't listen to Dusty Springfield's music much, I just put on Dusty in Memphis, and from a music standpoint, ten times out of ten, I will chose the original Dusty songs over Shelby Lynne's covers in Just a Little Lovin'.
Am I missing something. The Shelby renditions are boring, the arrangements are meandering and take themselves too seriously and just put me to sleep boring. The Dusty originals are scored with big band arrangements, have wider dynamic envelopes, are faster paced generally-speaking and just generally more engaging.
Don't get what all the fuss is about.

