Searching for Home Theatre: Pepperland goes Blu Ray

Lefisc

New member
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
482
Location
Long Island, New York




Mark Evanier (http://www.newsfromme.com) is someone I know and respect. He wrote a great book on Jack Kirby, conducts seminars on comics and has written for TV. He had a similar path in home video but gave up when it came to Blu-rays. Like many, he did not want to rebuy all the movies he already bought. I understood his frustration. I, myself, held off getting a machine for a couple of years. Mark wrote an interesting and informed column on why he will not get a Blu-ray some time ago.

In 1959 my brother Norman brought home our first excursion into what would eventually be called Home Theatre. It was a ten minute, 8mm film in black and white of Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. It was a silent, subtitled, greatly abridged version. We took out our Bell and Howell Projector that my father bought in 1946 and watched the movie a zillion times. Soon we got a version of This Island Earth, a Three Stooges short and a Woody Woodpecker cartoon.

In the 1960s Castle films began selling 16mm sound films (and I think color) but we could not afford them.
In 1976 I got my first VCR, a Betamax. The picture and monaural sound were poor but I was able to record TV shows. Of course I recorded Abbott and Costello. Soon video stores opened, but most movies were $80-100 so I didn’t buy any but I must have rented a few.
Beta
Disney sued to have the record button removed from VCR for copyright reasons. But the Supreme Court ruled against them in the early 1980s and within a couple of years everyone had a VCR and rental stores were all over the place. But it was a competing system. JVC, that thrived as Beta (the better system, by the way) fell to the wayside.

In 1981, Pioneer released the Laser Videodisc. These discs produced, at the time, the best TV picture I had seen. By 1985, these discs were in stereo and often had “letterboxed” or widescreen editions of movies. They also began featuring bonus segments and, with The War of the Roses and Tootsie, optional narration over the movies. These discs looked very good on my 25-inch set, I fact, for the first time, I put the TV between my stereo speakers to hear the movie out of bigger speakers. These discs, however, never really were very popular. The discs were expensive, generally $30-50 but running up to $100. These were the same size as an LP and also had to be turned over with only one hour of the movie on a side. Not many stores sold them either.

In 1990, when I moved into my house, there was no Home Theater as we know it today. TV screen were no bigger than 40 inches and surround sound was just beginning. I set up a very nice music room. But by 2000 I got my first HD, 60-inch Pioneer Rear Projection TV and placed it between the speakers. This killed the great sound I was getting for my music, having such a big box in the middle. That was my reason, several years to put a screen on the wall (110 inches) and use a front projector. I also put speakers in the rear walls to have surround sound too.

When DVDs came out, about 1998, I had a 32-inch TV set. DVDs were the size of CDs and were sold everywhere, relatively cheaply including my supermarket. Later, I was able to get used discs very cheap, as little as four for $20, so rather than rent, I bought. DVDs, of course had a full movie and often bonus features on one side and many of the features introduced on the Video Disc, a product that was instantly made obsolete by the smaller discs.

The DVD’s look very good and HDTV looked better. HD has about four times the resolution of a DVD. Well, a few years ago Blu-ray came out. How much better could it be?

DVDs were designed to give the best picture on our older, standard definition TVs, made with round glass picture tubes. Blu-ray is supposed to give the best picture to large, flat Plasma, LED and LCD High Definition screens. And it does.

Without a doubt, I finally feel like I am in a movie theater. The picture is big, sharp, colorful, with great contrast and detail. It’s a little too good. Nick Caputo, who contributes to my blog, says he wants to wait for the Blu-rays rather than see movies in the theatre and sit through a half an hour of commercials and coming attractions.

Because the picture is so good, many great movies, like Yellow Submarine, The Godfather, The Seventh Voyage of Sindbad, and all the James Bond films have been remastered, redone to show the better images.

Honest to gosh, my brother and I put on The Wizard of Oz just to see what it looked like and could not shut it off, we loved it! Then, we put on some black and white movies to see what they look like. Citizen Kane, The Day the Earth Stood Still, and The Third Man were incredible. They were just beautiful, detailed and with great contrast. But the step up in quality with Goldfinger,Dr. No, Fantasia, Snow White, and even Star Wars is noticeable and worth the effort.

Blu-ray also giver you 3-D. I saw the movie Hugo with in the theatre and at home in 3-D and it was fun and wonderful, But I still hate those darn glasses. John Carterlooks fine in Blu-ray 3-D, but the color and detail stand out in regular 2D. So 3-D is not something I use much. The new machines are not expensive and start at $80. Make sure you get one with an “upscaler.” This will make your present DVDs look sharper and more colorful, but not as good as a Blu-ray.

But I am leaving out the sound, which is incredible too. Even Citizen Kane’s 70 year old mono track was exceptional and detailed. This, after a long journey from Pepperland, brings us back to Yellow Submarine.

First, I am not now, nor have I ever been a Beatle fan. Or a fan of Rock n Roll. So why did I get this disc: Because Yellow Submarine is, frankly, a great, inspiring movie. I am now so used to computer animation, Toy Story, Shrek and Up, that I was startled by how beautiful. imaginative and compelling hand animation can be. On Blu-ray the colors were back, the back grounds were wonderful and the story was so much fun.

The first thing that really got to me was the sound quality, which was better than a CD. You have to hear it to believe how quiet the background is, and how the voice is right there in the room. Remastered from the original sound elements, the surround sound here is wonderful, sometimes exaggerated and often funny.

Eleanor Rigby picks up the rice in the church where a wedding has been
Lives in a dream
Waits at the window, wearing the face that she keeps in a jar by the door
Who is it for?

For someone who has taken this journey, this may not sound right, but I am interested in the movies, not the technology. I see the technology not as the goal but a means to an end, to have the movie experience at home and watch some great films.

I have to invite Mark Evanier over. We can watch Goldfinger, which I recorded on my VCR, bought the Laser Disc, then the DVD and finally now the Blu-ray. At least I hope “finally.”
 
A great chronological telling of video technology and your involvement/enjoyment from it, Barry. I still have my Pioneer Elite LD player (think it still works) along with some special LD box sets, as well as one of the first (if not the first) Sony DVD player on the market. I used to subscribe to Doug Pratt's Laserdisc Newsletter, some of the most interesting media reviews I have ever read.

With the advent of 4K TVs, I'm sure the technology on the the little silver disc will continue to evolve and the studios will get us to buy yet one more version.:rolleyes:

Nice post!:coolyeah:
 
I got the laserdisc newsletter too. I think it's still around. I'm going to google it.

ps. Did you ever realize that booksellers area doing this too. The want you to buy the digital book too.
 
I think it's still around. I received a re-subscribe letter from Doug not that long ago...
 
It's funny how things change. His was the first and only newsletter that discussed not just what the movie was about but the quality of the laser disk. Oh ladder what's most important to me. Although wish 20 years ago laser disks within $30-$50 in general. I am paying less than half that for the average blu ray. So was a big investment then. But now I can go online, even to the Amazon site, and read a lot of reviews of the movie and the disks. I haven't thought of his newsletter in many years. I wonder how it's doing?
 
I wonder, too. In one newsletter, he asked if anyone had work for him to do. I guess in the Internet age and online reviews so prevelant, subscriptions waned.

While his reviews of the disks was why I subscribed, I did appreciate his insights into the movies themselves. I thought they were, uh, well, very insightful!

Widescreen Review, I think another under appreciated publication, does a good, albeit short, review of the disc quality.
 
It is just amazing how technology has changed so many people's jobs in the last years. The method of reaching people, which used to be printed material that you bought I was delivered to you by the post office or you went to pick it up, is now gone with the wind. It's funny because I used to read his newsletter and then go over to Tower Records and look at the laser disks that were there. It's not that there are no longer laser disks it is no longer Tower Records. I also remember that we used to by TV Guide. The ironing now is that TV is so much bigger and better and TV Guide has become worthless because he cannot cover everything it needs to cover. My business used to use typesetters to put together publications. Now we do everything in house. All those people are out of work. At least he is companies for data processing they're all gone too. And most important to this site is so many of the audio and video stores are just gone. Often stores would close I think eventually be replaced somewhere in the neighborhood. Now they are just gone.
 
WOW!

Holy cr@p that was crazy.

I think I got it all. I'm going to be cleaning house tonight and hopefully prevent some of that in the future.

Houston we have a major problem!

EDIT: Fixed now, thanks big time! ...That was the bigger spammer I ever saw in my life!
 
Actually it read like my Marantz 8002 instruction book. And it made about the same amount of sense! Thanks for being on it so quickly.
 
Back
Top