An update: Jeff clarified with me that his speakers are the MKS-X model which retail for approximately $60,000 - that's Raidho D3 territory. Wow.
Ok, so Jeff has worked very hard moving things about. Furniture out, furniture back, speakers closer together and no toe in. The left/right imbalance still exists. Full credit to Jeff, he has done yeoman work and it has improved a little - on some songs, some sources.
I listened to my material - CD's and vinyl - for almost two hours. I kept notes on my thoughts and at Jeff's insistence, I gave him my honest feedback. He was extremely gracious and said he appreciated my honesty. My respect for Jeff went up a lot. It would have been easy for him to tell me to take a hike, but he didn't. I have to say, I appreciated that. He had always been honest with me (and he was right about my Aida's). It's not easy being totally honest with someone. I value his opinion immensely as well.
Listening notes:
This is now my fourth time listening to the Polymers, and even after break in, my opinion hasn't changed much. I found soundstage width limited to inside the left speaker to inside the right. I found the tweeter to be a joy to listen to, with no sibilance, no brightness and smooth as silk. However, cymbals should be more prominent, they seemed almost muffled on some songs (example: Fleetwood Mac, Fleetwood Mac on 45RPM vinyl). As a testament to the good tweeter, the Polymers sound pretty good at low volumes, but not nearly as good as the Raidho D3's - which might be the best I've ever heard at low volumes. Soundstage depth was good, but soundstage height was not. I'm sure the rather small speaker height contributes to this. The bass remains quite muddy and undefined. On some tracks, the bass was hollow sounding (example: Eagles - Hotel California). This was bizarre to experience to say the least. On the bright side, there wasn't any midbass overhang. After two hours, I just find the overall soundstage so small sounding. At this price point, they should fill the room and sound much much bigger. Jeff's previous speakers ($3500) had no problem filling his moderately sized room. I'm most certainly not a speaker designer, but I can't help but think the port on the back (located behind the tweeter) is either in the wrong spot or an additional port near the bottom is needed. My friend and speaker designer John also agrees. He felt that the overall voicing was off....but it was the imaging that really concerned him.
Jeff asked me about value and I gave him my honest number as compared to other speakers I've heard which cost a lot less, and Jeff's previous speakers which cost $3500. I realize Daniel Khesin, founder of Polymer Audio likes to talk about the expensive parts which make up his speakers. That's great...but I only care how they sound. At ~$60,000 retail, expectations are high, very high and to me, the Polymer MKS-X do not live up to the value test.
They aren't my cup of tea. I'm sure there will be some who will be smitten with them - and that's great. They just aren't for me. As always, YMMV.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD