- Thread Author
- #21

Here is a new pic, shows the top sealed midrange enclosure more clearly. In assembly, the machine pattern on the top will be filled with damping material.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
In summary:
* The new S3 (2023) is two pounds heavier than the current S5 mk2.
* The tweeters are the 28mm diamond-coated beryllium (like M series)
* The midrange is now the graphene coated honeycomb aluminum driver used in the A5 and M9.
* The 9 inch bass woofers are new and made with the graphene coated honeycomb aluminum like the midrange.
* An all new footer system
* A far more extensive enclosure with far more bracing.
* The shape of the cabinet (even the top) is monocoque and also has no flat surfaces helping eliminate reflected energy and distribute sound better into the room.
All the above are significant advancements over anything in the S lineup.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
The mid does have its own enclosure, it’s just not a “bubble” anymore. The new one, tested using the laser vibrometer, produced better results.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I seriously doubt that this is a better solution. We will see what happens with the S5 or S7 upgrades
88dB 4ohm
I was really hoping Magico would start moving new models to a more efficient spec....
![]()
Here is a new pic, shows the top sealed midrange enclosure more clearly. In assembly, the machine pattern on the top will be filled with damping material.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Anyways, will be interesting to see or read how their competitor from Utah will bring forth the Sasha DAW V next year most likely at a similar price point.
.
I'm told that the machine Magico used to extrude the aluminum enclosure for the S3 and S3 MkII broke down a couple of years ago and is reportedly unrepairable.... which is why they haven't been manufacturing these lately. I think this machine also placed limitations on the shape of the enclosure. A carbon fiber solution (like the M2) is probably too costly for an S3 offering.I am really curious why Magico didn’t use a monocoque cabinet for the new S3 but opted to go with an internally braced cabinet. A monocoque design is proven to be stronger and much easier and cheaper to produce. Of course a stronger cabinet doesn’t necessarily correlate to one with lower vibrations.
Ken
I am really curious why Magico didn’t use a monocoque cabinet for the new S3 but opted to go with an internally braced cabinet. A monocoque design is proven to be stronger and much easier and cheaper to produce. Of course a stronger cabinet doesn’t necessarily correlate to one with lower vibrations.
Ken
I wonder why the midrange enclsure is gone ... they made quite a fuss when they first introduced it a few years back.
Cost, probably. Likely had an impact on the cost of the BOM.
From Magico FB:
View attachment 31889
David Hyman
I talked to alon about it. It's actually an improvement over internal enclosure. "We found out, after we got the laser vibrometer, that the pressure that was building up between the bubble, and the actual enclosure was creating more issues than the bubble potential benefits. The bubble was also interfering with critical bracing placement. We are getting better results using this method."
The mid does have its own enclosure, it’s just not a “bubble” anymore. The new one, tested using the laser vibrometer, produced better results.