MBL Lives!

I have a different take. The idea of active speakers is VERY promising to me - precise matching of amps with drivers, far shorter signal path, theoretically less cost due to fewer components and cables, etc...

On the DSP thing, I would welcome it with open arms IF it would improve the overall sound of the system in my room.

Now, getting a tube amp inside a speaker could be a bit of challenge...

I respect your thoughts. I'm talking about market realities of people spending that kind of money.
 
I hear you. Maybe it's a small niche, but I want to believe that there are at least a few high end customers who are interested in the concept.

If not, it wouldn't be the first time that I found myself out of touch with reality...
 
Yes. I met with several of the new key people at Axpona and we’ve had constant contact ever since. You do realize a company is more than one person, right? There are several other bright young engineers at MBL. In fact, I chatted with one this morning and discussed their excitement regarding the new products they launched at Vienna. We chatted about technical stuff relating to the new Xtreme’s and Noble streamer. We deal with senior leadership and the great folks in the back office (accounting and shipping) every day.

Maybe my wrong interpretation but you seem a bit testy on the subject. To be clear I am on team MBL. With that being said I'd like to push back with a couple items. Hot shots at MBL should have introduced the new products to the press if any visited as no mention of new products I was able to find. I fully believe what you said. In your remarks regarding ARC they as well brought in new capable engineering, after the Acora purchase. I suspect the new owners of MBL have deep pockets which gives MBL a big positive.

I suppose it's debatable based on one's bias how well Dynaudio has done after their similar purchase. From what I see they are thriving pretty well.

We'll have to watch to see how it all plays out.
 
Maybe my wrong interpretation but you seem a bit testy on the subject. To be clear I am on team MBL. With that being said I'd like to push back with a couple items. Hot shots at MBL should have introduced the new products to the press if any visited as no mention of new products I was able to find. I fully believe what you said. In your remarks regarding ARC they as well brought in new capable engineering, after the Acora purchase. I suspect the new owners of MBL have deep pockets which gives MBL a big positive.

I suppose it's debatable based on one's bias how well Dynaudio has done after their similar purchase. From what I see they are thriving pretty well.

We'll have to watch to see how it all plays out.
What you may wish to know is that the new leadership will not be embarking on the same activities as the prior team.

They did announce the new products at Vienna.

Maybe some haven’t reported it yet?
 
I have a different take. The idea of active speakers is VERY promising to me - precise matching of amps with drivers, far shorter signal path, theoretically less cost due to fewer components and cables, etc...

On the DSP thing, I would welcome it with open arms IF it would improve the overall sound of the system in my room.

Now, getting a tube amp inside a speaker could be a bit of challenge...
DSP can be used to improve the overall sound of any system in any room (that would include your system in your room). From an engineering perspective, there is no fundamental reason an active speaker with DSP could not emulate the audible behavior of a tube amplifier quite convincingly without needing any tubes inside a speaker.
 
Most people in the high end don't want active and don't want DSP. Those two traits are better served in the much lower priced lifestyle systems.
While some (not most) audiophiles remain skeptical, the industry’s most technically advanced speaker designers increasingly embrace DSP.
DSP has done more for my system than cables, power conditioners, isolation devices, Ethernet switches, streamers, or most of the accessories commonly discussed in audiophile circles.
 
While some (not most) audiophiles remain skeptical, the industry’s most technically advanced speaker designers increasingly embrace DSP.
DSP has done more for my system than cables, power conditioners, isolation devices, Ethernet switches, streamers, or most of the accessories commonly discussed in audiophile circles.

DSP works for sure. I use it in my studio. Having said that, it is not embraced by those in the higher end. In all cases I've heard while it makes some great changes, it still has negative aspects to it.
 
I’ll be the contrarian. I like active speakers a lot! But I don’t think active horn speakers would be my cup of tea. I want 109db efficient speakers so I can use my 2A3 or 45 or type 50.

I like active speakers in the more traditional form. Pylon makes the Jasper 25 in active. Goldmund made some good active speakers. YG and Estelon too. I do think it’s a part of the future of HiFi. There are many things you can do with an active speaker you can’t do with a passive crossover.

That being said, the happy medium is active bass IMO or in my case at home, subs using DSP to fill in the bottom end of my antiques!
 
DSP works for sure. I use it in my studio. Having said that, it is not embraced by those in the higher end. In all cases I've heard while it makes some great changes, it still has negative aspects to it.
I’m not sure what you mean by DSP not being embraced in the high end. To paraphrase the old Oldsmobile slogan, today’s DSP is not your father’s DSP.

The DSP implementations available today are vastly more sophisticated than what many audiophiles experienced 10–20 years ago. In fact, a growing number of owners of very expensive, so-called “high-end” systems use DSP for room correction, crossover design, bass management, and speaker optimization. Folks are achieving results that would be difficult or impossible to obtain otherwise.

Whether one likes DSP is a matter of personal preference, but I don’t think it’s accurate to say that it isn’t embraced in the high end. Its adoption is far more widespread today than many people realize.
 
I’m not sure what you mean by DSP not being embraced in the high end. To paraphrase the old Oldsmobile slogan, today’s DSP is not your father’s DSP.

The DSP implementations available today are vastly more sophisticated than what many audiophiles experienced 10–20 years ago. In fact, a growing number of owners of very expensive, so-called “high-end” systems use DSP for room correction, crossover design, bass management, and speaker optimization. Folks are achieving results that would be difficult or impossible to obtain otherwise.

Whether one likes DSP is a matter of personal preference, but I don’t think it’s accurate to say that it isn’t embraced in the high end. Its adoption is far more widespread today than many people realize.

I'm basing it on the thousands of high end owners I engage with through my channels, the high end dealers, companies and manufacturers I talk with on a near daily basis, and what is displayed and talked about at shows.

I can count on one hand the number of high end owners who use DSP.

On mid-fi it is certainly more popular for sure and in the professional world.
 
Michael is right. Audio flat-earthers don’t favor powered speakers, DSP or not, because they eliminate several variables and choices in system setup. No need to try and match amps and speaker cables to the speakers. No chance to spend $10k on wire between amps and speakers. No chance to spend $100k on amps. Less secret sauce = less influence on the sonic outcome. That will take the ‘fun’ out of it for a lot of folks. This built-in resistance is real.

When I was designing speaker systems for high end corporate jet aircraft I went to all powered speakers. I could achieve a much better sonic result that way given the size and weight constraints I had. I wish I had DSP at the time - I could have made a better sounding system.

I’ve auditioned the Dutch and Dutch 8C and really like what I’m hearing. The high end B&O speakers - not so much.

It will be interesting to follow what high end manufacturers are doing with DSP as it continues to evolve and get better.

I wish MBL all the best. I still want to get a set of MBL 101E MKII - probably my end game speakers.
 
No wonder, WT9R is right! 😮
For sure. We choose to get the best sound possible.

When we're not too busy making sure we don't fall off the end of the earth, we're listening to the best sounding music possible while the DSP crowd is busy trying to tell us how we're wrong and they're right.

We usually can't hear them over the sweet sound of our system. ;)
 
Back
Top