Jeans rant

M

Mr Peabody

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
3,519
Location
St. Louis, MO, USA
Have you noticed and its been this way for awhile, that waste sizes in jeans can't be trusted. I typically wear a size 34 in the waste. Now when I buy 34 it fits like 36 in the waste. You say just buy 32, if I do that then it's too snug in the legs.

I have two theories. First the waste is being made larger to accommodate our larger society and to make men buyers feel better about themselves or it's to accommodate the trend to wear sagging jeans.

So I found a brand that sells 33 which fits my legs and I have to wear a belt. Is the majority of men now large waste pencil legged individuals? :)
 
Some of it seems to me to be the elasticity common in today’s fabrics, even jeans, causing way different fit than before.

I have been losing weight since retiring, and picking pants is strange now.
 
Mr Peabody said:
Have you noticed and its been this way for awhile, that waste sizes in jeans can't be trusted. I typically wear a size 34 in the waste. Now when I buy 34 it fits like 36 in the waste. You say just buy 32, if I do that then it's too snug in the legs.

I have two theories. First the waste is being made larger to accommodate our larger society and to make men buyers feel better about themselves or it's to accommodate the trend to wear sagging jeans.

So I found a brand that sells 33 which fits my legs and I have to wear a belt. Is the majority of men now large waste pencil legged individuals? :)
Click to expand...
I’m sure you mean “waist”
 
My nut job sister in law told me it's anti-inclusive to have mens and women's jeans separated in a store - that they all should be unisex and in one section so we don't need to "choose" if we want male or female jeans.

I tried to explain the basics of biology and how are bodies are shaped different and have different....um....body parts but she was having none of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top