If you had to choose only ONE pair of speakers for rest of your life ...

I know people speak of the ESL 57s in near reverential terms, but in reality it is a very limited speaker. No real bass, not much on the top end, and it's basically a midrange speaker that can't take much power at all before it arcs and blows holes in the panels. If you love chamber music played at low volumes, I guess they are OK. I like the original Quad II amps that were designed to go with the ESL 57s much better. Fitted with NOS Mullard KT-66 tubes and NOS Mullard rectifier and those little amps rock much harder than the ESL 57s ever could have hoped to.

Other than the above deficiencies, I think the ESL-57s are great! :P


heeere we go... another doubter:rolleyes: they sound like sh!t on the stock feet, mine are raised 18" and angled forward slightly so they're horizontal, they've been rebuilt (Sheldon stokes). 57s have QUALITY bass, they just don't plumb the depths and the ultimate lack of sparkle on top is because: 1) your hearing acuity doesn't extend far enough or 2) you have them on stock feet and the treble is hitting your chest not your ears.

think big headphones when listening to 57's they're best suited for near field listening.
 
microstrip posted independently performed measurements of the ESL 57 which showed pretty flat on-axis frequency response from about 45 Hz to 17-18 kHz; as good or better than many touted modern speakers.
 
Based on speakers I've heard multiple times for more than an hour, I'd go with Aerial 10ts.
 
I've had lots of speakers, but my current pair might be with me the rest of my life......

Magnepan 3.7

Not that I might not buy some more to have fun with also......
 
I've had lots of speakers, but my current pair might be with me the rest of my life......

Magnepan 3.7

Not that I might not buy some more to have fun with also......

Dynaudio C2 Platinum in Mocca Finish, just ordered a pair should have them next week and I could see keeping these as my main staple speaker. I am also with you on Magnepans, love the 3.7 but since I just bought the Dynaudios the 1.7 I have I don't think I will get rid of either. I am sure I will dabble with many other monitors over the years but those 2 are not going anywhere.
 
I have a stacked QUAD 57 pair I built in 1978 and still use them to this day. Never wanted to change. I built them using the Mark Levinson HQD as a model (see article on Stereophile), but my tweeter is the T1 Sequerra instead of the Decca he used. In order to play a little louder than a standard QUAD 57, I made a modification in the speakers and it seems, after 36 plus years, none of them have a had a single failure. The mod consists basically on separating the mid frequencies (around 600Hz and above) to be played by the mid panels, and the low frequencies (below 600Hz) for the bass panels. And for the frequencies below 100Hz, a subwoofer does the job. Yes, it needs 4 amplifiers (all tube, except for the subwoofer) and a high level preamp with a frequency divisor (I use passive filters) to separate the frequencies. It is more complicated than the standard power amp + speaker, but the result is incredible. Nothing can play middle frequencies like the old QUAD 57 and high frequencies like a ribbon tweeter. From time to time, I wanted a higher output level (I like jazz and classical) and have experienced quite a few dynamic speakers, only to return to my old QUADs. I use a Futterman H3aa pair (I purchsed it directly from Mr Futterman - he was building these amplifers by hand at the time - mid 80´s) to play low frequencies in the bass panels and the result is jaw dropping. Yes, I also have a pair of QUAD 63, but they never matched the old stacked QUADs.

Cheers,
 
A lot of pretty great speakers mentioned so far. Interesting to see the diversity of small and large panels, small and large dynamics, horns, and omni-directionals. MBL if you have the space to do them justice can be pretty spectacular. I heard a set of custom horns (big ones) in Hong Kong that was one of the finest speakers I've heard. Better than any production horn I've heard - but they are just so big. I think with these threads I would answer big room and small/medium room - HA - then you can give two answers. I would take the big horns in the big room simply because my preference is for SET amplifiers and I've not heard a SS amp or PP tube amp that I think I could live with. Great speakers will merely tell me more about why I don't care for those amps all that much. So a big ole horn Western Electric kind of deal would probably be it for me. Although I find them all to be generally hideous looking.

For the small/medium room I will go with Audio Note. I bought the AN J's ten years ago finding them to pretty much trounce everything in their size class. Then became a reviewer - heard pretty much everything since then and couldn't say that anything really changed my view. Although at least I heard a lot more significant sounding speakers I still came away saying - yes but it's 3-10 times more expensive. Moving to Hong Kong buying the KEF LS-50 but that wasn't going to be a long term solution - so I wound up with the near entry level AN E/Lexus. I tried to alter course re-listening to Quad 2905, Magnepan 1.7, 20.1, Dynaudio Countours, Focal Utopia, Legacy, Revel B&W, more KEFs, Zu Audio, ATC, Sonus Faber, Paradigm, Teresonic, DeVore, Trenner and Freidl, Gallo, Spendor, Magico, Tannoy, Vivid Audio, SandersSound, Harbeth, Reference 3a, McIntosh, PMC, Canton, TAD, YG Acoustics, Avantgarde, Soundlab, Martin Logan, MBL, Wilson Audio, Wilson Benesch, JBL, Coincident Technologies, Ensemble, KingSound, Acoustic Zen, Von Gaylord, and numerous others. It would be a stretch to say I couldn't live with many of these speakers because I think I could. Especially the Higher efficiency varieties but the AN E for me is like the favorite pair of slippers. What I like about them - their unique presentation - is difficult now to live without. The AN E/Spx Alnico Hemp is the model that I lust for but they will come in time as the entry model is always upgradeable at a later date. In a large room I'd move to big single driver and or horns but in a normal room for me the AN E (specifically the E/Spx Alnico Hemp) is still the king of the hill.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • ane.1.jpg
    ane.1.jpg
    205.3 KB · Views: 285
I use the AN E stands. I have had numrous recommendations to fill them and with what to fill them and some find it all sounds much better without being filled at all. I should think it would depend on the positioning. Filled works for me. But my room is concrete and I have them up against the back wall which is half covered in acoustic foam. With a wooden home with plaster walls and carpeting then this might change.
 
I still believe that the ATL approach used by PMC provides a superior sound compared to sealed and bass reflex systems, regardless of brand or price..
 
For me, it would be the Salon 2's.

They are a perfectly balanced speaker, amazing on and off axis. They just don't do anything wrong, and that's a high compliment.
 
For me, it would be the Salon 2's.

They are a perfectly balanced speaker, amazing on and off axis. They just don't do anything wrong, and that's a high compliment.

+1 Neutral and transparent. They play soft, loud, detailed, excellent imaging, ultra smooth treble and deep bass. No weak points, IMO.

Ken
 
Back
Top