- Thread Author
- #1
I am in the process of commissioning the construction of some more bulk power cable to feed my system expansion.
When it comes to my tube amplifiers I use Siltech Ruby Mountain II G7. This is a no compromise ZERO emission cable. Siltech IMO are the holy grail of audiophile cable performance for many real scientifically proven reasons but they are expensive. There is real, quantifiable material science that goes into their construction.
So that is where the Furutech range with their PowerFlux and Bulk cable options are serious contenders where their products can give you exceptional performance at more realistic price points.
There are four important factors when it comes to power cables: Gauge, metallurgy, shielding, termination. The Furutech range considers these factors in their product line-up.
It is easy to choose a cable based on the first two criterion but often the third important element, shielding, doesn't always get the full attention it deserves. If you are commissioning bulk cable, I can promise you that you can get close to zero emissions by choosing to dress an already internally shielded cable with appropriate outer braiding.
Many will know that I am a huge Techflex fan. Techflex engineer some amazing braided sleeve solutions for aerospace, military, medical and AUDIOPHILE solutions. I advocate their products because they manufacture real solutions that have been scientifically measured, and independently verified and accepted by industry worldwide. Techflex has a long history of active participation in and support of a variety of industry trade groups. That means real verifiable science that anybody can objectively test for themselves.
To date, I have successfully used Techflex Flexo Anti-Stat (formerly called Flexo Conductive) to braid and finish Furutech bulk cable with results that rival emission level performance measurements of other off-the-shelf brands.
Yes, I have been criticised and ridiculed online for posting my opinion on this topic, but there is a real basis which is not founded on some proprietary shifting, pseudo-science marketing. So I take no offence by those who choose to flame my thoughts on this topic.
I am going to take this next bulk cable build one step further with a specification that will consist of the following solution:
1. Furutech FP-TCS-31 α (Alpha) PC-Triple C Power Bulk Cable
2. Furutech FI-50 NCF(R)
3. Furutech FI-50M NCF(R)
4. Techflex Flexo Chrome XC
5. Techflex Flexo Anti-Stat
Note the addition of item 4. Flexo Chrome XC. Flexo Chrome XC heavy duty expandable metallized mylar sleeve is ideal for dressing up any application with the look of braided stainless steel.
Mylar is well known for its EM/RF rejection properties. I use it to internally line storage boxes for long term electronic component storage. For example, if you put a phone in such a lined box, it cannot receive a signal. Similarly, in the event of an EM pulse, the electronics will be protected from damage. Those attributes in itself means something favourable for an affordable DYI or commissioned audiophile grade power implementation / solution.
So I propose to braid Furutech FP-TCS-31 α (Alpha) PC-Triple C Power Bulk Cable chord with Techflex Flexo Chrome XC first and then finish off by braiding with Techflex Flexo Anti-Stat over that layer before plug termination of choice.
I look forward to conducting a basic EM proximity radius reading on such a dressed cable and perhaps ZERO emissions are achievable to that of the Siltech Royal Signature products.
I merely seek an honest performance outcome for the benefit of the audiophile consumer and have no affiliation or commercial interest in the brands that I have mentioned above.
How will the solution affect the sound when used with and in proximity of sensitive HiFi equipment (interchangeably with analogue and/or digital component outputs)....That is the REAL question....
When it comes to my tube amplifiers I use Siltech Ruby Mountain II G7. This is a no compromise ZERO emission cable. Siltech IMO are the holy grail of audiophile cable performance for many real scientifically proven reasons but they are expensive. There is real, quantifiable material science that goes into their construction.
So that is where the Furutech range with their PowerFlux and Bulk cable options are serious contenders where their products can give you exceptional performance at more realistic price points.
There are four important factors when it comes to power cables: Gauge, metallurgy, shielding, termination. The Furutech range considers these factors in their product line-up.
It is easy to choose a cable based on the first two criterion but often the third important element, shielding, doesn't always get the full attention it deserves. If you are commissioning bulk cable, I can promise you that you can get close to zero emissions by choosing to dress an already internally shielded cable with appropriate outer braiding.
Many will know that I am a huge Techflex fan. Techflex engineer some amazing braided sleeve solutions for aerospace, military, medical and AUDIOPHILE solutions. I advocate their products because they manufacture real solutions that have been scientifically measured, and independently verified and accepted by industry worldwide. Techflex has a long history of active participation in and support of a variety of industry trade groups. That means real verifiable science that anybody can objectively test for themselves.
To date, I have successfully used Techflex Flexo Anti-Stat (formerly called Flexo Conductive) to braid and finish Furutech bulk cable with results that rival emission level performance measurements of other off-the-shelf brands.
Yes, I have been criticised and ridiculed online for posting my opinion on this topic, but there is a real basis which is not founded on some proprietary shifting, pseudo-science marketing. So I take no offence by those who choose to flame my thoughts on this topic.
I am going to take this next bulk cable build one step further with a specification that will consist of the following solution:
1. Furutech FP-TCS-31 α (Alpha) PC-Triple C Power Bulk Cable
2. Furutech FI-50 NCF(R)
3. Furutech FI-50M NCF(R)
4. Techflex Flexo Chrome XC
5. Techflex Flexo Anti-Stat
Note the addition of item 4. Flexo Chrome XC. Flexo Chrome XC heavy duty expandable metallized mylar sleeve is ideal for dressing up any application with the look of braided stainless steel.
Mylar is well known for its EM/RF rejection properties. I use it to internally line storage boxes for long term electronic component storage. For example, if you put a phone in such a lined box, it cannot receive a signal. Similarly, in the event of an EM pulse, the electronics will be protected from damage. Those attributes in itself means something favourable for an affordable DYI or commissioned audiophile grade power implementation / solution.
So I propose to braid Furutech FP-TCS-31 α (Alpha) PC-Triple C Power Bulk Cable chord with Techflex Flexo Chrome XC first and then finish off by braiding with Techflex Flexo Anti-Stat over that layer before plug termination of choice.
I look forward to conducting a basic EM proximity radius reading on such a dressed cable and perhaps ZERO emissions are achievable to that of the Siltech Royal Signature products.
I merely seek an honest performance outcome for the benefit of the audiophile consumer and have no affiliation or commercial interest in the brands that I have mentioned above.
How will the solution affect the sound when used with and in proximity of sensitive HiFi equipment (interchangeably with analogue and/or digital component outputs)....That is the REAL question....
Last edited:
