mep
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 5,092
Mep, please show me where I described the A3 as a piece of junk? You keep writing that I have passed judgement on the A3. Where and when have I done so. In fact, I suggested to Al M. that he audition the A3 specifically because I liked my Q3 so much and he was in the market for a new speaker at that price point. I don't know if he went to audition the A3 specifically because I suggested it. You would have to ask him. Regarding Ack's comments to me: People share opinions with me all the time. That does not mean I agree with them or even comment about it.
I did not realize that Ack has now since heard the A3. That is new information to me and seems to have occured much after his earlier comments. He has not discussed his actual A3 listening impressions with me. I just read about it a few minutes ago hear.
Regarding the M3, I liked my earlier demo of the M3 very much and argued quite a bit with Ack via email about our differing opinions. It was only the second time I heard them with different LPs, and some different components, but in the same room, that I did not like them. Ack has a more consistent negative opinion about the speaker. As I have written repeatedly, I remain open minded simply because I loved it the first time I heard it, and I love my friend's M Pro. The M3 is the clear descendent of the MPro. I even went to a dealership in NYC to hear the M3, but it was not set up, so that will have to wait for another time.
Again, if you claim that I passed judgment about the A3's sonics by describing it as a "piece of junk", please show me where I did so.
There are four people in the Boston Audio gang, and you are one of the four. When Ack posted directly to you on WBF and said "the new A3 which has been described internally among us as a piece of junk" I certainly thought you were part of the "us" that participated in the discussion. So now you are saying you weren't part of the "us" in the discussion about the A3. Case closed.