Devialet 400 review by Soundstage Magazine

Adrian Low

New member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
205
Location
Toronto Canada
Senior Editor Jeff Fritz reviews the 400 monoblocks:

SoundStage! Ultra | SoundStageUltra.com (UltraAudio.com) | Devialet 400 Mono Integrated Amplifier-DACs

“Would you believe that the best match I’ve heard for the $185,000/pair Magico Q7 [speakers] is the $6495 Devialet 120? I know -- hard to fathom.” That statement was a problem for a lot of people. Was I crazy? Could I not hear? What the heck was going on?! So it’s important that I make my comments about the Devialet 400 as clear as possible. But first, a bit about my amplification biases

I’ve always gravitated toward large, powerful, solid-state amplifiers, and I’ve had a lot of them in my system over the years: Ayre, Boulder, Gryphon, Halcro, Krell, Levinson, Musical Fidelity, Simaudio, Vitus, and ten other brands I can’t recall right now. The areas of amplifier performance that most matter to me are a low noise floor, tonal neutrality, and absolute control of the loudspeakers. If those qualities are present, it has been my experience that most of the rest of the audiophile hot buttons naturally follow: precise imaging, resolution of detail throughout the audioband, and overall clarity, to name a few. Having laid that groundwork, I’ll tell you what I heard with the Devialet 400s -- starting with what I didn’t hear.

The Devialet 400s were the quietest amplifiers ever. They just didn’t make any noise. While it’s true that I heard virtually nothing from the tweeters of my speakers when I fired up these amps -- and man, was that cool the first time I tested it -- it was what I didn’t hear at the listening seat that most impressed me. That quietness led to the most complete retrieval of detail I’ve ever heard from my system. I could simply hear deeper into the music -- more information, both spatial and musical, reached my brain than did from other amplifiers

... the Devialet 400s were more quiet than any of them, which made them the most resolving I’ve heard. There was more tangible space around notes, more depth in recordings -- simply more information.
In terms of tonal neutrality, most expensive solid-state electronics don’t veer too far from dead center. Still, in a highly resolving system, it’s easy to hear that the Simaudio and older Gryphon Audio Designs amplifiers sound slightly warmer than the models from Boulder Amplifiers and Vitus Audio, which strike me as more flat-line neutral. The Devialet was as tonally neutral as the best, though this is an area that I’m just not convinced needed improving when considering the best solid-state on offer. Still, you should consider that the Devialet 400 did not in any respect sound like a tube amplifier. It altered the signal as little as anything I’ve heard in this regard -- you can’t “fix” a problem in your system’s sound by adding a Devialet, as you can by adding a tube amp to a system that has a threadbare sound, or Transparent Audio cables to one that sounds bright and/or bass shy.

Control. Although the quietness of the Devialets may be what first wowed me -- it was just hard to believe that I could hear so far into my music -- it was the 400s’ control of the speakers’ drive-units that provided the most long-term satisfaction. Here, there was just no comparison with anything else I’ve heard. The 400s controlled the woofers in my speakers to a degree that improved those speakers’ bass response beyond what I’d thought them capable of. This meant that, from the highest highs through the lowest lows, the character of the sound remained more consistent. Here’s what I believe was happening: We’re used to hearing a gradual loss of control the lower in frequency the music goes, something that can be especially evident when listening through large, full-range speakers to music with heavy low-bass content. Down low with such recordings, most amps’ grip on the woofers loosens ever so slightly. But the Devialet 400s seemed to control my speakers’ woofers as easily as they did the tweeters.


Such total control meant one thing: I hadn’t known how much bass texture and articulation my speakers were capable of -- or exactly what a given recording’s bass actually sounded like -- until I heard them with the Devialet 400s. Paired with the Magico Q7 speakers, the 400s were revelatory in this respect. Electric bassist Jonas Hellborg’s solo album The Silent Life (16/44.1 ALAC, Day Eight Music) goes beyond visceral and deep, and the Devialets reproduced it marvelously. It was really about bass detail. Imagine how articulate bass might sound if your amp(s) were wired directly to your brain. That’s what I was hearing -- there seemed to be no physical barriers between the music and my ears. The Hellborg album was amazing.

Lastly, the Devialet 400s’ sound quality didn’t change -- at all -- the louder I played my music. In this respect, it’s a perfect match for a speaker like the Magico Q7, which also just gets louder and louder, without compression or distortion. The pairing sounded as at ease at 95dB as it did at 80dB. When I cranked it up past 100dB, nothing happened . . . except that the music got loud. You know the point where you sense that you shouldn’t play your system any louder because you don’t want to break something? With the Magico-Devialet combo, I never reached that point. If loud and clean is your thing, or if favorite recordings in your collection have impressively wide dynamic range, you can’t do better than the Devialet 400s.

I’m as surprised as you that I’m saying this, but the Devialet 400s produced the best sound I’ve ever heard."

Winner of Soundstage Magazine's Pioneering Design Achievement 2014
2014 Product of the Year Award Winners

Well Done!
 
My local dealer called me in to hear their 800's after they came back in from an audition at one of their customers. They did not use SAM with the Magico's that day during my audition but we did try the unit(s) with both the digital connected directly to the unit and from the analog out of their MSB Dac. They sound was pretty good especially when you consider what you save on power cords and interconnects let alone the pricing of a separate DAC and pre-amp. That said based on MY audition the 800 is not yet capable of competing with many of the better separate set-ups available today. On that day the comparison was the Soulution integrated. If I was to consider a second 2-channel set-up Devialet would be considered.
 
I'm really interested in the Devialet 400. I'd love to hear it.
 
I heard a Devialet at the NYAS w Totem(?) speakers. I was pretty impressed with what I heard. I'd love to get a unit for a second system.
 
Ha!

Looks like you'll have to get in line. Mark keeps "asking" :) err, telling me to send it to him. I can only imagine how great it will sound on your speakers.

And Id like to try your CJ kit! :rolleyes:
 
I guess you can't please everyone all the time. I'm reading and hearing more positive opinion than negative opinion, so those people that I trust seem to love it. That's good enough for me.
 
I heard the 200 on the Harbeth 40.1's, it was very,very good with those speakers.

I'm sure that just like any other amp, speaker synergy will be the key.
 
My local dealer called me in to hear their 800's after they came back in from an audition at one of their customers. They did not use SAM with the Magico's that day during my audition but we did try the unit(s) with both the digital connected directly to the unit and from the analog out of their MSB Dac. They sound was pretty good especially when you consider what you save on power cords and interconnects let alone the pricing of a separate DAC and pre-amp. That said based on MY audition the 800 is not yet capable of competing with many of the better separate set-ups available today. On that day the comparison was the Soulution integrated. If I was to consider a second 2-channel set-up Devialet would be considered.

Same here. I had an original D Premier and while technically very nice, sonically it just didn't deliver anything. I'd use it in an home entertainment system for the tv....
Funny how Class D amps do it for some but most just don't like them
 
I guess you can't please everyone all the time. I'm reading and hearing more positive opinion than negative opinion, so those people that I trust seem to love it. That's good enough for me.

At least the writer was honest with regards to what he heard (or didn't hear). In the same way that many people flocked to CDs and abandoned LPs, we are seeing something similar play out with people abandoning Class A/B amps for Class D. The promise of having something more for less is always alluring. People need to decide for themselves whether they are hearing an amp that is "ultra-transparent" or if they are hearing a false sense of transparency due to the music being scrubbed clean of natural harmonics that should be present. I can't answer the question because I have zero experience with Class D amps in my system.
 
The Devialet is a proprietary Class A-D hybrid, so it's not Class D. It has a more liquid smoother sound than some of the harsh Class D amps I've heard.

As for Matej, it might not be his cup of tea, but has he ever officially reviewed it? He's been known for doing reviews of products that he only hears at a dealers (see his review of the Sonus Faber Amati Futuras for example). Also, there aren't any Devialet ads among the dozens on the left, right, middle, top and everywhere in between on his site.

Just saying...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Mike-He did say he heard it in his own system so that should mean something. I will put more credence in that than I would the lack of Devialet ads and any attendant conspiracy theories due to lack of same.
 
The Devialet is a proprietary Class A-D hybrid, so it's not Class D. It has a more liquid smoother sound than some of the harsh Class D amps I've heard.

As for Matej, it might not be his cup of tea, but has he ever officially reviewed it? He's been known for doing reviews of products that he only hears at a dealers (see his review of the Sonus Faber Amati Futuras for example). Also, there aren't any Devialet ads among the dozens on the left, right, middle, top and everywhere in between on his site.

Just saying...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I understand where you are coming from. It's hard to separate his reviews from the advertorials, especially if you see all his postings on Facebook. But he did say he heard the amps in his as well as several others systems. But yes it have been nice to see a real review.
 
Absolutely Mark,

Unless I live with something for a while, I don't really know it and even then, it's only in the context of my system. I certainly don't want reviewers to praise something for the heck of it. I respect all points of view. I see what gear that I like and see what reviewers agree with what I think I am hearing and gravitate towards them for some guidance. Usually it works pretty well. I hope to hear one in a few weeks so I can decide from myself if it's something I could live with long term.

At least the writer was honest with regards to what he heard (or didn't hear). In the same way that many people flocked to CDs and abandoned LPs, we are seeing something similar play out with people abandoning Class A/B amps for Class D. The promise of having something more for less is always alluring. People need to decide for themselves whether they are hearing an amp that is "ultra-transparent" or if they are hearing a false sense of transparency due to the music being scrubbed clean of natural harmonics that should be present. I can't answer the question because I have zero experience with Class D amps in my system.
 
I've heard the original D-premier and more recently the Dev 250 in my system, and like Matej, wasn't overly impressed.
 
I wonder if we compare a $9500 integrated with built in 24/192 DAC, MM/MC phonostage, speaker correction, gorgeous remote, AirPlay, etc. what we would think?

My point is: price perspective

Is a pair of Soulution 701's/725/746 going to sound better? Probably, but we aren't comparing apples to apples either.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Let me summarize this guys review..."The devialet offers superb cosmetics, excellent transparency and resolution, but lacks an intangible quality that truly musical high end systems deliver and is therefore not a suitable replacement for a true hi end stack of separates." Talk about vague. Hard to put much weight on such a weakly supported view.

Can an anyone articulate why exactly this guy didn't like the devialet amps? I doubt it, he never really explains...

I would add that devialet also measures better than any high end stack of separates on the market regardless of price.
 
People need to decide for themselves whether they are hearing an amp that is "ultra-transparent" or if they are hearing a false sense of transparency due to the music being scrubbed clean of natural harmonics that should be present.

No argument that people may prefer other high end systems to a devialet system. But the idea that a more accurate cleaner audio signal is removing something that should be present like natural harmonics makes little sense. The devialet might well produce a cleaner and truer signal that eliminates something that people are used to hearing in other high end system. It is also true that some people might like the devialet system less because of this. However what is clearly not true is that whatever it is that has been lost from the signal is something that more closely reflects fidelty to the original music performance.
 
Back
Top