Class D if so inclined

Just read the follow up. Those amps as tested with the new tweaks are incredible performers. If you really want to know how an amp performs, look at the 19 kHz and 20 kHz two-tone IM. This amp is -120 dB!

Here is the two tone imd for the Electroacompianet 300 M monoblock retailing for $30,000. It is 10 dB worse than the Buckeye. For 20x the price.

View attachment 34955

That's not the total story. I wouldn't buy an amp based on written specs. It would have to pass the listening test.

There's at least one online magazine who pushes Class D like they get a cut yet not one reviewer has one in their reference system.

Maybe you want to replace your Mac I'm sure it doesn't spec as well as the Buckeye.
 
Just read the follow up. Those amps as tested with the new tweaks are incredible performers. If you really want to know how an amp performs, look at the 19 kHz and 20 kHz two-tone IM. This amp is -120 dB!

Here is the two tone imd for the Electroacompianet 300 M monoblock retailing for $30,000. It is 10 dB worse than the Buckeye. For 20x the price.

View attachment 34955


These are measurements, how does it sound.?
 
I don’t have any idea how it sounds since I haven’t auditioned it. I don’t buy anything without an audition or an in-home trial.

And yes, I’d bet that my McIntosh stuff doesn’t measure as well as the buckeye. Probably about the same as that $30,000 Electroacompianet amp.

Then again, I am a vinyl nutjob and vinyl measures 100x worse than any of this stuff and still sounds fantastic.

At $1150 for a stereo amp I might have to buy one just to check it out. Purifi modules are designed by Bruno Putzeys who is an excellent audio engineer, one of the best.
 
Hi - so in your experience do all Class D amps sound the same that will enable people to get "same voice" with a sub? So would the Class D amp on an SVS sub be voiced and sound the same as one of Ralph's class D amps?

Of all the Class D I've heard there is a very wide difference in their sound.

Also many powered subs are class D. I've heard many that integrate very well with various classes of amps.

It would seem that it's more a matter of crossover type, frequency, sub placement, etc. that would dictate how it blends and integrates sound-wise more than simply "all class D". Would you agree?
Yes different topologies voice and drive differently even mosfets sounds different from bjt and different tubes sound different from each other ..!

You can hear class D voicing blind folded ..!

Regards
 
Last edited:
You are splitting hairs, they call it ClassI but it's still a switching amp. Still not one of the under 20 pound items like today. And, unique to any other Levinson amp.
The No.53 uses what Mark Levinson calls a patented, multistage "very high speed switching amplifier technology," Interleaved Power Technology (IPT), which is claimed to offer significant advantages over prior switching-amp topologies.


In a conventional class-D amplifier, one output transistor connects the output to the positive voltage rail, another connects it to the negative voltage rail. It is very important that when one transistor is turned on, the other must be turned off and vice versa, otherwise the positive and negative voltage rails will be short-circuited and the amplifier will self-destruct. However, because one transistor will be turned off before the other is turned on, there will be a short period of "dead time" when neither is turned on. This is analogous to crossover distortion in a conventional class-B amplifier.


ML's engineers set out to develop a new PWM output stage designed to overcome these limitations. The transistors switching the positive and negative voltage rails to the load in Levinson's "class-I" topology are each connected to the load via a large air-cored inductor and to the opposite voltage rail via a diode. The result is a stable amplifier with an effectively doubled switching frequency. Modulating the duty cycle of the 500kHz switching frequency of each transistor results in a 1MHz PWM output signal but without producing anything like the usual amount of ultrasonic noise. So minimal are the ultrasonic artifacts in the No.53's output, it is claimed, that, rather than requiring a sonically degrading brick-wall filter, all that's needed to remove them is a simple notch filter.


The No.53 uses four interleaved class-I/IPT stages in a balanced bridge configuration, to produce an effective PWM switching frequency of 4MHz. This allows the No.53's signal bandwidth to be extended to 100kHz.


Four Subsections
Thats a lot of hairs being split :)
 
Interestingly I found this link in a thread here from 2023 where Anthony says you can hear the transition from Class A to A/B, at least he is consistent. A/B means there is some Class A bias in all A/B, it would be terrible if that transition could actually be heard.

 
As a former jazz guitar player, (with a clean tone on an arch-top), I loved my class D amps. I think the brand I was using at the time was called Clarus. Nice power, nice tone, and light!! Sometimes, living in the Virgin Islands, I'd have to load up the car, drive to the ferry dock, get my equipment out of the car, load it onto a ferry, go to another Island, unload, get into the back of a pick-up truck with home-made benches in the back that were loaded up with people to make multiple stops, never meant to carry people that way, be driven up & down crazy narrow roads on the left side of the street, get to the the resort/gig, get my gear out of the pick-up, get into a golf-cart, be dropped off, and then walk the rest of the way to the gig. All while not trying to mess up my suit in 90' humid weather. - I liked class D! :)
Can you imagine doing all that with a Fender Twin? Not that I don't love tube amps for guitar but it just wasn't practical.
 
Back
Top