Brian, you mentioned that the N10 could have an 4 TB internal storage. But on their web page they still write 1 TB. What news have you heard.
Thanks Mike that's great news. Do you know if 4 TB is the full capacity or is it 2 + 2 TB in a Raid set up (resulting in 2 TB of efficient storage)?
I like everything except the price tag. But if I get 8000 USD worth of improved SQ - I am all ears.
And maybe get a comparison/feedback with the N100H...
( as if I wasn't confused enough already....)
What's the N100H?
It will be very interesting to try the N10 and N100 side by side this autumn, to hear if there is a SQ improvement that justifies the price increase of the N10.
Will hopefully run them together with the Aria from Digibit.
Yes N10 via USB would be the only worthwhile comparison, probably not much in it, the extra cost for the N10 is most likely primarily to fund the other outputs. If you have a top-end USB DAC and are using a NAS for your library, I can't see where significant SQ gains are going to be made over the N100... but I'm interested to see if this is really the case.
The N10 is not the N100 with more outputs . The S10 ( N10's predecessor) & W10 took issues of power supply, isolation, jitter management to a very serious implementation. The X100 & N100 are simpler , less-comprehensive solutions to meet a more mainstream audience. It would be hard to justify a price of $8000 vs $2500 simply by increasing the number of outputs.
... which is why I'm interested to see what the actual SQ gain will be for the dollar, if it's worthwhile, I'll upgrade... but commonly "less is more" is banded around with audio componentry and the N100 appears to represent "minimal functionality, done properly".
There is a review on My Hi-End (I used google translate) and they say:
"N100 whether in use or music replay are fully felt a sense of joy to listen to music no burden, although almost as perfect and as good as the overall performance of the flagship W20, but the sound is neutral towards the clear direction softly in dynamic and the transparent cleanliness are showing pretty good level, can be seen in the design and manufacture of high-resolution aurender digital turntable skill giants really skillful, to construct or upgrade the system with high-resolution music files home can definitely be considered a good focus on design aurender."
I have no idea if the above is true but I have a feeling that the law of diminishing returns is going to be at play.
.
Yeah; and I'm typically in the less in more, when it comes to computer audio, camp. Hard drives make noise, make heat...break down, etc; no getting around that, no matter how good the implementation. That being said...there are some findings, about local files...versus those streamed over network; so perhaps there is worthwhile trade-off (though I think that remains to be seen).
Personally...$2500, vs. $8k; the difference in SQ would have to leap out, at me. I mean, that's like going to a $32,000 amp, from a $10,000 unit.
Yeah; and I'm typically in the less in more, when it comes to computer audio, camp. Hard drives make noise, make heat...break down, etc; no getting around that, no matter how good the implementation. That being said...there are some findings, about local files...versus those streamed over network; so perhaps there is worthwhile trade-off (though I think that remains to be seen).
Personally...$2500, vs. $8k; the difference in SQ would have to leap out, at me. I mean, that's like going to a $32,000 amp, from a $10,000 unit.
ok, thanks, and now I'm confused 'cuz i thought the X100L with 12 TB was about $3500 ( or maybe 3800, can't remember ) so why would I want the N10 for 8K? ( rhetorical question)