New update regarding tubes. Last night I played around with the 101D tubes on their normal setting, and on the higher 300B setting. On the normal setting, the 101D are indeed more threadbare, and with the 300B setting they are warmer. Detail might have suffered slightly on the 300B setting, but overall I prefer it. From what I gather from Fred and some others, there is likely a significant to major decline in tube life using the 101D on the wrong setting, but given uncertainty over the exact circuit in the Lampi, it's hard to say how much.
Additionally, I was using a Brimar rectifier from Langrex in the above, and in our auditions Saturday. Last night I switched back to the Lampi version KR 5U4G rectifier. It is a cleaner sounding rectifier, which would have the effect of making the 101D sound even thinner. However, it is a much better match to the new Lampi EML 45's, which are richer/warmer sound than the 101D. So, if I had to live with the 101D, I would want a warmer rectifier like the Brimar, and likely also run the 101D on the wrong 300B setting. That's the only way the tonal balance sounds right to my ears on my system. But in switching to the 45 tubes, it's evident the Brimar is adding warmth in the form of distortion, and the Lampi 5U4G is cleaner and more resolving rectifier that mates well with these high end 45 tubes. Overall, I achieve the same tonal balance with the Lampi EML 45/Lampi KR 5U4G as I do with the WE101D-L running hot on the Brimar 5Z... from Langrex, but greater refinement and detail is achieved with the former rather than the latter. Indeed, the system sounded better last night than over the weekend.
Ok, sorry for the digression, that I realize is somewhat off-topic - this thread being about Atlantic. But I wanted to wrap up this lingering variable, since it's relevant to our comparison impressions from the weekend.