Absolute Neutrality - Possible? Do we even want it?

Zero said:
You know, I think most of us would actually prefer a neutral piece of gear - - - - - if we lived in an ideal world. And by ideal world, I'm talkin' about some kind of parallel universe to where most recordings sound fantastic, and that we have access to materials that can pass along an electronic signal without imparting any kind of audible fingerprint. Pretty kickin' right?

Sigh. If only....

Back here on earth, the reality of the situation is that most recordings suck donkey D when it comes to sound quality. On top of that, I know of no physical component (not even a conductor!) that can truly sound invisible. This is partly why I applaud the engineers who work so hard to build gear that they feel is 'true to the recording'. They have a super tough oar to row. Even if they were to succeed in creating a brutally honest component - the question then becomes - who'd be willing to $$$pay$$$ to hear the truth? Using the current market as a rough indicator, I'd say the answer is a resounding.. "not many..".
Click to expand...


Zero...Can you handle the truth? Can you? :o Then read on...

9/12 The Changing Frequency of our Humanity

Our selective DNA adapts to environmental change and resonates with the frequency of our biosphere. The Schumann Resonance of 7.83Hz is the fundamental beat of our existence and that of the natural world that we have been nurtured into. Unbeknown to the general population, since the advent of WWII, we have been subconsciously subjected to the systematic broadcasts of unnatural harmonies tuned at 440Hz. This conspiratorial western dominated subversion was suggested to the powers at be on the basis that Verdi’s A of 432Hz was not congenial to population herding, control and material motivation. So, since the Baby Boomer generation, we have been listening out of tune, living out of natural harmony and trapped from our truly creative potential.

We are prisoners to another subconsciousness. Who? One that has many potentially long term ill affects towards our evolutionary process as a species. Our continued existence is dependant upon us remaining mathematically consistent with the universe.

440Hz generational programming is destructive. It’s negative effect compounds with each generation which will eventually lead to our demise.

Believe it or not. :bonkers:
 
Bluefox... I do have an Acoustic Revive RR-777. I'm convinced it is positive in its manner & I wholeheartedly recommend this little box. I run it with a dedicated linear power supply like others have done which appears to give it some more oomph. It's difficult to explain what it does & therefore understandably can be categorised as one of those hocus pocus tweaks. It runs in insolation to the system & is projected into the room 24/7 just like WiFi is. Perhaps it harmoniously adds to the room pressurization in such a manner that allows the audible frequencies to ride on top of the Schumann Resonance which adds dimensionality & makes the music more pleasing to listen to.

I'm tempted to buy another & have a spare linear power supply for a 2nd unit.


For those who seek a definition on the "Schumann Resonance" - The EM harmonic frequency of life as we know it.

In the normal mode descriptions of Schumann resonances, the fundamental mode is a standing wave in the Earth–ionosphere cavity with a wavelength equal to the circumference of the Earth. This lowest-frequency (and highest-intensity) mode of the Schumann resonance occurs at a frequency of approximately 7.83 Hz.

Schumann resonances occur because the space between the surface of the Earth and the conductive ionosphere acts as a closed waveguide. The limited dimensions of the Earth cause this waveguide to act as a resonant cavity for electromagnetic waves in the ELF band.
 
Why is A=440 any different than A=432 relative to the Schumann resonance frequency?
 
My Acoustic Revive RR-77 is the only thing I would consider fringe in my system, and I have a complete Shunyata power and cabling setup. The Shunyata gear I consider absolutely essential, but even after a couple of years I cannot make up my mind about the AR. At this point, my attitude is it can't hurt and might help, so I leave it in the rack.
 
rbbert said:
Why is A=440 any different than A=432 relative to the Schumann resonance frequency?
Click to expand...

There has been craziness about "A" above middle for centuries, Thankfully the range has been narrowed. The internationally accepted "A" is 440, but some American orchestras use 442 and some European orchestras use as high as 443. I generally prefer a slightly darker sound and some Baroque performers (I love Baroque music) use almost a half tone lower for their A.
 
So once you clear your mind, take a deep breath & exhale. According to those in tune to the mind, body, spirit world; it goes something like this:

On the musical scale where A has a frequency of 440Hz, the note C is at about 261.656 Hz. On the other hand, if we take 8Hz as our starting point and work upwards by five octaves (i.e. by the seven notes in the scale five times), we reach a frequency of 256Hz in whose scale the note A has a frequency of 432Hz.

According to the harmonic principle by which any produced sound automatically resonates all the other multiples of that frequency, when we play C at 256 Hz, the C of all other octaves also begins to vibrate in “sympathy” and so, naturally, the frequency of 8Hz is also sounded. This is why (together with many other mathematical reasons) the musical pitch tuned to 432 oscillations per second is known as the “scientific tuning.”

This tuning was unanimously approved at the Congress of Italian musicians in 1881 and recommended by the physicists Joseph Sauveur and Felix Savart as well as by the Italian scientist Bartolomeo Grassi Landi.

In contrast, the frequency chosen in London in 1953 as the worldwide reference frequency and which all music today has been tuned to, has come to be defined as ‘disharmonic’ because it has no scientific relationship to the physical laws that govern our universe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top