Recent content by AJ Soundfield

Talk is cheap, I'll demonstrate ;-). See you then, take care till Craig.

Oh dear. No wonder you didn't like it. FM curves show our varying sensitivity to frequencies at varying levels. It has nothing to do with this. Your speakers, like your source, pre and amp, should have a "flat" or linear/neutral response. You hearing will respond accordingly at different...

Did you measure the speakers and then apply adjustments based on those measurements, or.... There is no such thing as a house/target curve ;-). The only "target" should be as flat/smooth on AND off axis of your speakers native/onset response. If your speakers already possess this, then indeed...

Completely oblivious to the DSP imbedded in your system via recordings and of course there will never be any measurements of your inferior analog conversions showing where "bandaids" would fix. IOW, the typical audiophile system like the 100s, maybe 1000 including shows, I've heard. Don't worry...

So now you admit you didn't realize like most audiophiles, DSP was in your mains all along. Just an inferior analog version. Well, Craig decided he could do better...and did.

I'm well aware of audiophile OCDs, MoFi comedy gold etc

Yeah like MoFi and everything else recorded > 80s.

https://www.audioshark.org/threads/whats-your-preferred-main.26819/#post-382786 :)

And oblivious to the DSP they listen to every day playing back recordings made >70s

It means I know what DSP is

Oh and Happy Thanksgiving to all

A lot of audiophiles are stuck in the 40s-70s. The last 45 years of recordings say Hi

Congrats Craig, enjoy! Btw, recordings have been "DSP" since the 1980s and Ozzy's Paranoid was released in 1981. Coincidence? cheers AJ

Hate to admit it but yeah, its speakers

In other news, a tree fell in the forest