- Thread Author
- #1
Where can I find the provenance of a recording?
For example, if I want to download the 1970 Crosby Stills Nash & Young Deja Vu album in 24/192, it appears (from my research) that these tapes were converted to digital only once in 1994. So, in 1994, they were likely converted at 16/44 using a not-so-state of the art today A2D converter. A A2D which has likely found it's way into the junkyard by now.
So, if I buy the 24/192 version, I am simply getting the 16/44 version that someone has upsampled to 24/192 and is now charging more than the CD (a few dollars used), more than the 24/96 version ($17) and wants a whopping $24 for an upsample of an upsample?
IMO - this is very disingenuous. If the tapes were converted digitally to 24/192, I'm happy to pay the $24. If the tapes were converted digitally to 24/96 and then the 24/96 was upsampled to 24/192, it's somewhat of a rip off. If the tapes were converted digitally to 16/44 and then upsampled to 24/96 and 24/192, then it's a big rip off.
Not having proper access to the provenance of the version we are buying is very disingenuous IMO.
Maybe I will just stick with the original vinyl pressing I paid a few dollars for. At least I know where that came from.
For example, if I want to download the 1970 Crosby Stills Nash & Young Deja Vu album in 24/192, it appears (from my research) that these tapes were converted to digital only once in 1994. So, in 1994, they were likely converted at 16/44 using a not-so-state of the art today A2D converter. A A2D which has likely found it's way into the junkyard by now.
So, if I buy the 24/192 version, I am simply getting the 16/44 version that someone has upsampled to 24/192 and is now charging more than the CD (a few dollars used), more than the 24/96 version ($17) and wants a whopping $24 for an upsample of an upsample?
IMO - this is very disingenuous. If the tapes were converted digitally to 24/192, I'm happy to pay the $24. If the tapes were converted digitally to 24/96 and then the 24/96 was upsampled to 24/192, it's somewhat of a rip off. If the tapes were converted digitally to 16/44 and then upsampled to 24/96 and 24/192, then it's a big rip off.
Not having proper access to the provenance of the version we are buying is very disingenuous IMO.
Maybe I will just stick with the original vinyl pressing I paid a few dollars for. At least I know where that came from.