What's with the trend in amp design?

Mike says Jerry likes bite and forward sound. I know a few others.

I don’t want to be assaulted listening to music.

I’d say the Ref 6 is more aggressive than bright.


Joe said the Ref 6 preamp is bright and he couldn't stand it.
 
Last edited:
I may have been the first to voice that opinion, but I can name 4 or 5 friends here (but I won’t) who’ve come around and agreed that the treble on the Ref 6 is a little aggressive. Especially compared to the Ref 10 and GSPre to name two.

I don’t remember the full system context but we’ve heard it and it’s not my cup of tea. This is my opinion, and of several friends that I know. I’m not claiming that I have the best hearing, but if something is aggressive or forward, it drives me nuts. My TAD CR-1 drove me nuts, I’m sorry to say and the Musical Fidelity Nuvista 800 was another piece that I could not live with either.

Joe-Didn't you rave about the TAD CR-1s up to the point where you sold them? Weren't your latest pair of McIntosh amps you kept for 34 days "destination amps" and you said good things about them until they headed down the road to their new owner? So now we have you and four or five of your friends who think the Ref 6 was bright. Were these people who own the Ref 6 or people who stopped by your place and heard it in your system?
 
They had the Ref 6 in their own system and ultimately came to the same conclusion. I never prompted them in any way.

Under certain conditions, the previous gear had some great qualities. Sure I was a little over the top and that was certainly my fault but at the time those posts were written, that’s how I felt. I guess I get excited and and wanted to post about it. It won’t happen again. I’ll be more reserved until the dust settles. Can you forgive me? It’s just my opinion of snapshots in time. I’m not a professional like you. I should know better.
 
Last edited:
Unless you have some inside information from a company that told you they are voicing their amps around an old, half deaf reviewer so he would like them, I'm not buying the reviewer theory. What company in their right mind would make everyone suffer with a bright product only to make a reviewer happy? It doesn't make sense to me.

Maybe. So what's driving this change?
 
Keith,

The Ayre MXR20 (and KXR20 - still wish I had that one), have so much in common with the D’Agostino amps. The Ayre amps might be the tiniest bit smoother on top, but the D’Agostino amps have a little thicker tone and a little more meat on the bone.

I ask as when I had the Vx-5 in for home demo, I found the treble remarkable - extended with no hint of fatigue. The Dart has a similar treble signature so it may be related to the lack of NFB.
 
If you liked the VX-5, you would LOVE the VXR-20 or MXR-20. Soooo much more goodness.

I ask as when I had the Vx-5 in for home demo, I found the treble remarkable - extended with no hint of fatigue. The Dart has a similar treble signature so it may be related to the lack of NFB.
 
Might these new amp tonalities, be because that speaker technology - especially in the tweeters (highs) has improved over the last 20 years.

Where an amp manufacturer was listening to his amp into a sota speaker 20 years ago, he thought it sounded too bright and harsh, but now when he listens to his amp with today's sota speaker that has less harsh tweeters so he adds a little bit to his amps so he is hearing the same end result?
 
Hi Dan,

What prompted me was this comment ....

https://www.audioaficionado.org/showpost.php?p=906749&postcount=46

"I did have an opportunity to listen to a pair of MC1.25KW’s w/ Stradivari’s. They are clearly voiced differently, and it isn’t due to the use of Thermal Trak Output Transistors.

My MC2KW’s have Thermal Trak Output Transistors, and still sound pleasing with the McIntosh “house sound”.

IMHO, there were other changes made that resulted in the 1.25K’s sounding on the bright, almost shrill side. My friend, who’s system I heard these with decided these Amps were not for him, and ultimately sold them. He now has MC2301’s and couldn’t be more pleased. "



Joe.......
I remember reading a previous comment by you where you expressed a less than enthusiastic response to the sound of the newest McIntosh MC1.25KW amplifiers. I was surprised to see that comment and thought perhaps the amplifiers did not have enough hours on them to settle into a permanent voice. Then again it could be that design changes in the amplifier circuits may have tilted the sound in a direction that simply did not please you. If and when I have the opportunity to audition the newest 1.25KW amplifiers, you can be certain I will post my impressions.
 
Last edited:
Might these new amp tonalities, be because that speaker technology - especially in the tweeters (highs) has improved over the last 20 years.

Where an amp manufacturer was listening to his amp into a sota speaker 20 years ago, he thought it sounded too bright and harsh, but now when he listens to his amp with today's sota speaker that has less harsh tweeters so he adds a little bit to his amps so he is hearing the same end result?

Yes, that's what I was referring to earlier with Toole's Circle of Confusion.
 
Maybe. So what's driving this change?

Beats me Mike. I don’t have enough information to hazard a guess. Is the amp being used with a preamp from the same company? What speakers were used? What sources were used? How did you determine this a new trend and it only affects amplifiers?
 
Beats me Mike. I don’t have enough information to hazard a guess. Is the amp being used with a preamp from the same company? What speakers were used? What sources were used? How did you determine this a new trend and it only affects amplifiers?

Everything remains the same. Amps, SOME preamps (based on a friend who upgraded his PREAMP from a v1 to a v2 from a well known DAC manufacturer for example). He eventually gave up.
 
Maybe. So what's driving this change?

Money, the only reason to bring out a new version of anything is for improvements and those changes include a new cost. Be it a new camera, new car, electronics as these new versions never stay at the same price. Got to make money some how, and if changing the sonic signature of a product means its a new version. Well there ya go. After all the following version will most likely put it back with the "new and improved" version. Its to simple of a why, but a business has to stay in business.
 
I don’t want to pick out any particular amps, because there’s likely people here who own them. But Joe and I have talked extensively about particular amps in private. We are in agreement.

We have seen people buy amps and flip them very fast. Uh hum...

I’ve just noticed a real trend for treble extension, increased sibilance and “bite” across SOME new SS amps and I’m trying understand why. What on earth would drive such voicing changes?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

On all speakers or on particular speakers ..??
 
They had the Ref 6 in their own system and ultimately came to the same conclusion. I never prompted them in any way.

Just to be clear Joe, Did those 4 or 5 friends own the Ref 6 or were they listening to a Ref 6 that belonged to someone else?

Under certain conditions, the previous gear had some great qualities. Sure I was a little over the top and that was certainly my fault but at the time those posts were written, that’s how I felt. I guess I get excited and and wanted to post about it. It won’t happen again. I’ll be more reserved until the dust settles. Can you forgive me? It’s just my opinion of snapshots in time. I’m not a professional like you. I should know better.

Sorry you feel the need to turn this around on me. You make the purchases and you write the words, not me.
 
They had the Ref 6 in their own system and ultimately came to the same conclusion. I never prompted them in any way.

Under certain conditions, the previous gear had some great qualities. Sure I was a little over the top and that was certainly my fault but at the time those posts were written, that’s how I felt. I guess I get excited and and wanted to post about it. It won’t happen again. I’ll be more reserved until the dust settles. Can you forgive me? It’s just my opinion of snapshots in time. I’m not a professional like you. I should know better.

Joe, I hope that its does happen again. I find your the candor of your views when you hear something new to be refreshing.

Thanks for all of your efforts here at AS on moderating and your posts. I look forward to what you have to say.
 
Thank you Le Roy. I think we are on the same page. I appreciate your kind words.
 
Back
Top