CDLehner
New member
- Thread Author
- #1
So...I've always heard, and the prices seem to bear it out; that bridging is "bad". For example...(and this is when the idea was laid out to me; early in my audiophile-dom)
Why not buy (2) Parasound A23s, for ~$2k and are said to deliver "400wpc"; as opposed to an A21, for ~$2500...and "only" 250wpc? (or, for that matter, JC1s; which are ~$9k for the pair...and deliver the same "400wpc".
Now...I've put all of the power figures in quotations, because I realize...you cannot get blood from a stone. Obviously...the A21, and especially JC1; have a larger power supply, deliver more current...and therefore, will have more to MUCH more headroom, and handle a true "400wpc" load easier.
And not that, it alone...is not insignificant; but is that it? Did I just ask and answer, my own question?
Because I'm wondering it, for "real"; about a pair of Bryston 2.5B3s. I see Joe already posted, the review...that also caught my eye. Actually, I was reading about the Rogue ST-100...which garnered "10 LPs"; but JS kept mentioning, the 2.5B3.
In that review; JS...who IMO, is notoriously tough on kit...gave the little Bryston, 9.5 LPs, and compared it to the Pass XA-30.8!
Here's my "concern"...and where I'm looking for some answers, from you EE types...lol; I've also always heard "with BIG power, can come BIG problems"...sonic-wise. I'm not even going to try and venture an uninformed opinion here; but I guess maybe, it has something to do with the amount of negative feedback needed...to control, BIG power...and the impact that has on sound?
And here's where I have a specific concern, about the 2.5B3. In his review...one of the things JS notes is "the 2.5B3 has only one pair of output transistors per channel, reducing parts count, simplifying the circuit, and potentially offering the purest sound possible from the “Cubed” circuit topology."
That kinda sounds like, it plays into the answer about BIG power/BIG problems a bit; and so I'm wondering...do I run the risk, of negating that "purity of circuit", by Bridging a pair??
Why not buy (2) Parasound A23s, for ~$2k and are said to deliver "400wpc"; as opposed to an A21, for ~$2500...and "only" 250wpc? (or, for that matter, JC1s; which are ~$9k for the pair...and deliver the same "400wpc".
Now...I've put all of the power figures in quotations, because I realize...you cannot get blood from a stone. Obviously...the A21, and especially JC1; have a larger power supply, deliver more current...and therefore, will have more to MUCH more headroom, and handle a true "400wpc" load easier.
And not that, it alone...is not insignificant; but is that it? Did I just ask and answer, my own question?
Because I'm wondering it, for "real"; about a pair of Bryston 2.5B3s. I see Joe already posted, the review...that also caught my eye. Actually, I was reading about the Rogue ST-100...which garnered "10 LPs"; but JS kept mentioning, the 2.5B3.
In that review; JS...who IMO, is notoriously tough on kit...gave the little Bryston, 9.5 LPs, and compared it to the Pass XA-30.8!
Here's my "concern"...and where I'm looking for some answers, from you EE types...lol; I've also always heard "with BIG power, can come BIG problems"...sonic-wise. I'm not even going to try and venture an uninformed opinion here; but I guess maybe, it has something to do with the amount of negative feedback needed...to control, BIG power...and the impact that has on sound?
And here's where I have a specific concern, about the 2.5B3. In his review...one of the things JS notes is "the 2.5B3 has only one pair of output transistors per channel, reducing parts count, simplifying the circuit, and potentially offering the purest sound possible from the “Cubed” circuit topology."
That kinda sounds like, it plays into the answer about BIG power/BIG problems a bit; and so I'm wondering...do I run the risk, of negating that "purity of circuit", by Bridging a pair??