- Thread Author
- #1
good morning everyone!
on page 20 in the June stereophile magazine, i found something interesting. it was an ad for PrimaLuna preamps. i have heard nothing but good things about Prima Luna.
in the ad, they claimed a "major brand" solid state preamp sells for $7595, and could sell for $2595 and "they would still make a fat profit"
wow.
this ad further claims that their tube preamps at $2200 and $3200 are better.
you know, when you are buying high end, costly equipment, you are CHOOSING to do so, as you do with a mercedes, $1 million dollar house,etc. a company making a good profit off well to do people is just fine with me, BUT adding $5000 to a $2500 preamp is pretty offensive. i work hard for my money, and want to spend it on GREAT RESULTS at a fair price.
what do you guys think? is this true? could the prima luna preamps be "better" than the one for $7600?
is this kind of markup typical?
call me "dumb in Massachusetts" ! ha!
have a great day
bob
:hey:
on page 20 in the June stereophile magazine, i found something interesting. it was an ad for PrimaLuna preamps. i have heard nothing but good things about Prima Luna.
in the ad, they claimed a "major brand" solid state preamp sells for $7595, and could sell for $2595 and "they would still make a fat profit"
wow.
this ad further claims that their tube preamps at $2200 and $3200 are better.
you know, when you are buying high end, costly equipment, you are CHOOSING to do so, as you do with a mercedes, $1 million dollar house,etc. a company making a good profit off well to do people is just fine with me, BUT adding $5000 to a $2500 preamp is pretty offensive. i work hard for my money, and want to spend it on GREAT RESULTS at a fair price.
what do you guys think? is this true? could the prima luna preamps be "better" than the one for $7600?
is this kind of markup typical?
call me "dumb in Massachusetts" ! ha!
have a great day
bob
:hey: