MusicDirector
New member
- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,013
So in terms of the physical medium's capability, Bob is right. CD (and certainly hi-rez digital) is capable of delivering a wider dynamic range than LP or tape but the reality is most digital recordings are mastered "hot" as BobM mentioned where the mastering engineers boosts the dBs across the entire song because artists and music studios want their songs/albums to sound loud because most people listen to the material on car radios, iPods, etc...(i.e., crappy play-back gear) and when you boost everything it makes it sound louder/clearer on inferior playback gear. This is known as the "Loudness" wars and much has been written about it. Generally speaking, LPs are marketed to a more discerning consumer and are generally mastered less "hot," meaning the mastering engineers retain more of the dynamic swings (soft to loud to soft etc...) because LP buyers are generally (again not always) more likely to have mid-fi to audiophile gear that is able to clearly showcase those dynamic swings/changes in a song, which by the way is one of the key things that makes music so enjoyable - that emotional roller coaster that a shift in dynamic can take you as part of the song's message.
If you google "loudness wars" and "compression" you will get a ton of hits on this. And of course there are a ton of differing opinions about this, even among mastering engineers but in terms of the medium's pure ability to deliver a wider dynamic range, digital (CD resolution on up) beats vinyl and tape.
I could not agree more. I think you have it there.