- Thread Author
- #1
<!-- #thumb --> <p>Looking at the latest issue of Hi Fi Plus, one of my favorite UK magazines, the cover shows a picture of the beautifully executed Constellation Audio products.</p>
<p>These super expensive high-end audio pieces are beautiful on the inside and the outside and cost a small fortune to own. *Much of that fortune is spent on cosmetics: to the point from a manufacturer’s perspective that it is quite possible the casework costs more than what’s inside on some products. *I am not making a comment on Constellation because I actually haven’t a clue, but there are some out there …..</p>
<p>I wonder where it’s appropriate to draw the line if you’re a manufacturer?</p>
<p>Cosmetics are important – we certainly spend enough on ours – but it is interesting to think about how it’s divided up.</p>
<p>I remember a period when PS Audio paid little to no attention to the casework, preferring to put all our budget into the insides rather than the outward jewelry. *I was standing at a CES in Chicago (they were held there many years ago) and a customer walked into our room and was running his hand over the product. *”Cheap stuff, eh? *Does it sound any good?”</p>
<p>“Yeah, it’s some of the very best – better than others costing ten times more!” *Said I.</p>
<p>“Hmm, you’d never know it. *If that’s true, why would you put it in this ugly box?” *Said he.</p>
<p>“Because we believe in putting all our money into what matters: how it sounds. *Every dime I spend on the casework is a dime I cannot put into making it sound better if I have a fixed budget.”</p>
<p>“The problem with that approach is that I, the consumer, have no means to evaluate your claims. *If the outside doesn’t look as good as the insides, then chances are you’ll never be noticed and, besides, you’re forgetting about pride of ownership. *It may sound great but I expect it also to look great on my shelf.”</p>
<p>He had a good point.</p>
<center><a href="http://www.pstracks.com/pauls-posts/cosmetics/11078/emailpopup/" onclick="email_popup(this.href); return false;" title="Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers" rel="nofollow"><img class="WP-EmailIcon" src="http://www.pstracks.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-email/images/email.gif" alt="email The value of cosmetics" title="The value of cosmetics" /></a>*<a href="http://www.pstracks.com/pauls-posts/cosmetics/11078/emailpopup/" onclick="email_popup(this.href); return false;" title="Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers" rel="nofollow">Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers</a></center><br /><!-- // MAILCHIMP SUBSCRIBE CODE --><center><a href="http://eepurl.com/eSzBY">Get new and fresh stories like this each morning by joining the folks reading Paul's Posts. Click here </a></center>
<!-- MAILCHIMP SUBSCRIBE CODE // -->
[Source: http://www.pstracks.com/pauls-posts/cosmetics/11078/]
<p>These super expensive high-end audio pieces are beautiful on the inside and the outside and cost a small fortune to own. *Much of that fortune is spent on cosmetics: to the point from a manufacturer’s perspective that it is quite possible the casework costs more than what’s inside on some products. *I am not making a comment on Constellation because I actually haven’t a clue, but there are some out there …..</p>
<p>I wonder where it’s appropriate to draw the line if you’re a manufacturer?</p>
<p>Cosmetics are important – we certainly spend enough on ours – but it is interesting to think about how it’s divided up.</p>
<p>I remember a period when PS Audio paid little to no attention to the casework, preferring to put all our budget into the insides rather than the outward jewelry. *I was standing at a CES in Chicago (they were held there many years ago) and a customer walked into our room and was running his hand over the product. *”Cheap stuff, eh? *Does it sound any good?”</p>
<p>“Yeah, it’s some of the very best – better than others costing ten times more!” *Said I.</p>
<p>“Hmm, you’d never know it. *If that’s true, why would you put it in this ugly box?” *Said he.</p>
<p>“Because we believe in putting all our money into what matters: how it sounds. *Every dime I spend on the casework is a dime I cannot put into making it sound better if I have a fixed budget.”</p>
<p>“The problem with that approach is that I, the consumer, have no means to evaluate your claims. *If the outside doesn’t look as good as the insides, then chances are you’ll never be noticed and, besides, you’re forgetting about pride of ownership. *It may sound great but I expect it also to look great on my shelf.”</p>
<p>He had a good point.</p>
<center><a href="http://www.pstracks.com/pauls-posts/cosmetics/11078/emailpopup/" onclick="email_popup(this.href); return false;" title="Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers" rel="nofollow"><img class="WP-EmailIcon" src="http://www.pstracks.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-email/images/email.gif" alt="email The value of cosmetics" title="The value of cosmetics" /></a>*<a href="http://www.pstracks.com/pauls-posts/cosmetics/11078/emailpopup/" onclick="email_popup(this.href); return false;" title="Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers" rel="nofollow">Forward to a friend and help us engage more readers</a></center><br /><!-- // MAILCHIMP SUBSCRIBE CODE --><center><a href="http://eepurl.com/eSzBY">Get new and fresh stories like this each morning by joining the folks reading Paul's Posts. Click here </a></center>
<!-- MAILCHIMP SUBSCRIBE CODE // -->
[Source: http://www.pstracks.com/pauls-posts/cosmetics/11078/]