Stanley cup final - - - Boston VS Chicago

If you're going to lose it's almost a fitting way to lose for Boston. I mean that in the same aspect of the quick 2 goals in the last 2 minutes when Boston tied game 7 in the first round and then won in overtime. Karma I tell ya.

Congrats Chicago.

You're exacly right, Chicago did the samething to Boston that Boston had done to Toronto a hockey game is 60 minutes not 58 or 59 Chicago deserved the win even if my team was Boston they both gave us some very very good hockey not the sissy cry babies Montreal Canadians hockey.
 
Howard was supposed to be too hot, Quick was gonna be way too quick for the Hawks. Rask was supposed to be unbeatable, after all he only allowed 2 goals in 4 games against the Pens.
There was all that talk about how Boston solved Crawford on the glove-side. When it came down to crunch time with 1:16 left on the clock in game 6 the Hawks solved Rask again with 2 goals in 17 seconds to win The Cup, Crawford won the goalie wars!
 
I agree. And Crawford should have been MVP. And I'm not even a Chicago fan, just a hockey fan.



Howard was supposed to be too hot, Quick was gonna be way too quick for the Hawks. Rask was supposed to be unbeatable, after all he only allowed 2 goals in 4 games against the Pens.
There was all that talk about how Boston solved Crawford on the glove-side. When it came down to crunch time with 1:16 left on the clock in game 6 the Hawks solved Rask again with 2 goals in 17 seconds to win The Cup, Crawford won the goalie wars!
 
I agree. And Crawford should have been MVP. And I'm not even a Chicago fan, just a hockey fan.

Kane and Crawford made huge contributions, needed both to win the trophy that matters most.
I do agree that Crawford should have been MVP, but both of their names are engraved on The Cup so no complaints here :)
 
Re: Stanley cup final - - - Chicago Won!

That's Hawkey Baby!

HawksRally2_zpse714def2.jpg
 
Back
Top