mep
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 5,078
Goodness Mark, I tried to let you slide but you are not at all being truthful.
1) The thread I made my original proposal in (What happened at WBF) had several comments about financial bias. That is why I made my proposal. You read them and you commented.
2) This thread has two posts that address financial bias (#54 and #60). You read it and have commented.
3) The recent thread at WBF titled "My views on Audio Reviewers" directly discussed financial bias among reviewers in posts #'s 8,24,45,46,79,80,86,87,91,92,94 in the first 10 pages alone. The thread goes on for 65 pages. I only listed direct references. Other posts reference the issue subtly and I did not include them. Who knows how many references you saw. It was started 6/13/15. You have read it and posted throughout.
That took 10 minutes. Do you really want me to look further?
Now knock it off Mark, you are embarrassing yourself.
Paul-I promise you that I will look at all of those threads tomorrow and report back on my findings. If those thread numbers you mentioned elucidate your position, I will certainly say so.