Kuoppis
New member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Messages
- 5,203
Before we get off on another one of these tangents where sound quality is equated to MSRP, magazine reviews and ad dollars spent this is what he actually said. "value for the dollar in a passive/active SS pre."
...sure, and unless the budget is 20K.
So the statement is actually misleading in several ways due to the law of diminishing returns when you go up the price points. On that route, while absolute performance typically increases with price, bang for the buck decreases.
The point is, it is neither meaningful to compare a 2K and 20K pre head-to-head, nor to say the 2K one is better value for money. Following that logic he should buy a pocket radio: makes sound, costs 5 bucks. Beats the W4S value for the dollar anytime.
A meaningful comparison needs to start with a set performance level and follow-up with a review to find out at what price point that performance is attainable.
Does the 2K W4S compete performance wise with even 10K preamps, no it does not. A value for money comparison argumentation only becomes meaningful when the performance level is defined.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk