TheOctopus
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 1,622
- Thread Author
- #1
This may not be a very popular topic with some of the "audiophiles" but here goes...
Nothing bothers me more about high end audio than some of the wild pseudo-science claims by some manufacturers. It has been a pet peeve of mine for a very long time and it does not seem to get any more rational as times moves forward. Now, I understand that manufacturers are in the business to sell their product, hence innovative designs from some that truly make a difference, to the "me too" companies and all the way down to some incredible BS and pseudo-science jargon thrown around to lure the audiophile.
I've noticed some really intelligent people buying into it, ignoring logic, common sense and worse yet, going against their actual scientific knowledge in the quest of better audio performance? How or why does that happen in the high end audio hobby so often? Now, we all know the Federal Trade Commission is not going to crack down on these wild claims from some of these folks who are trying to sell us their snake oil at exuberant prices and mind blowing profits for the simple reason it does not cause any harm to people but imagine if some of these claims were put to the test in other industries. :blush:
I have no beef with the audio gear/component manufacturers, they cost what they cost, take it or leave it, some are budget oriented, some are stratospheric in price but I have hardly ever heard of any amplifier, preamplifier or speaker manufacturer resort to pseudo-science in their marketing efforts. It is the cables and accessories that seem to resort to those tactics and for obvious reasons.
Let's not name any names to protect the guilty but have an open, adult discussion on this.
If you have a favorite example of some pseudo-science marketing, don't hesitate to share but let's keep the product brand names out of the discussion. No need for that, "caveat emptor" as the saying goes...
I guess I'll start.
A receptacle that through nano-crystalline carbon and ceramic powder generates negative ions to eliminate static and converts "thermal energy" into infrared..... Umm, OK, never mind that a receptacle has absolutely NOTHING to do with generating negative IONS as they occur in nature through various mechanisms none of which relate to a receptacle in any way, even remotely. The negative ION generators are HIGH VOLTAGE devices designed to ionize air molecules and let's just say you don't want THAT voltage in your receptacle....
I'm not even sure what to say about the "thermal energy and infrared" here.... :scholar: Yes please, I'll take a dozen!
Why resort to such tactics? Does it really benefit them in the long run? What do you guys think, maybe I'm missing something here?
The counter argument is always "But I do hear a difference" so it must be “your” ears or “your” system that does not resolve the difference in that $3k cable or a $5k power conditioner, a $300 receptacle with carbon fiber face plate, etc....
Nothing bothers me more about high end audio than some of the wild pseudo-science claims by some manufacturers. It has been a pet peeve of mine for a very long time and it does not seem to get any more rational as times moves forward. Now, I understand that manufacturers are in the business to sell their product, hence innovative designs from some that truly make a difference, to the "me too" companies and all the way down to some incredible BS and pseudo-science jargon thrown around to lure the audiophile.
I've noticed some really intelligent people buying into it, ignoring logic, common sense and worse yet, going against their actual scientific knowledge in the quest of better audio performance? How or why does that happen in the high end audio hobby so often? Now, we all know the Federal Trade Commission is not going to crack down on these wild claims from some of these folks who are trying to sell us their snake oil at exuberant prices and mind blowing profits for the simple reason it does not cause any harm to people but imagine if some of these claims were put to the test in other industries. :blush:
I have no beef with the audio gear/component manufacturers, they cost what they cost, take it or leave it, some are budget oriented, some are stratospheric in price but I have hardly ever heard of any amplifier, preamplifier or speaker manufacturer resort to pseudo-science in their marketing efforts. It is the cables and accessories that seem to resort to those tactics and for obvious reasons.
Let's not name any names to protect the guilty but have an open, adult discussion on this.

I guess I'll start.
A receptacle that through nano-crystalline carbon and ceramic powder generates negative ions to eliminate static and converts "thermal energy" into infrared..... Umm, OK, never mind that a receptacle has absolutely NOTHING to do with generating negative IONS as they occur in nature through various mechanisms none of which relate to a receptacle in any way, even remotely. The negative ION generators are HIGH VOLTAGE devices designed to ionize air molecules and let's just say you don't want THAT voltage in your receptacle....

Why resort to such tactics? Does it really benefit them in the long run? What do you guys think, maybe I'm missing something here?
The counter argument is always "But I do hear a difference" so it must be “your” ears or “your” system that does not resolve the difference in that $3k cable or a $5k power conditioner, a $300 receptacle with carbon fiber face plate, etc....