Again, how many DAC’s or network transports have a fiber input? Very few and it doesn’t seem to be growing.
It would make marketing sense to include an SFP port on this for the upstream link.
Again, how many DAC’s or network transports have a fiber input? Very few and it doesn’t seem to be growing.
It would make marketing sense to include an SFP port on this for the upstream link.
...so not having the data stream affected by whatever contamination could affect a copper cable in close proximity to power, speaker, ICs etc, probably is why I saw a difference..
Other than the X1, I can’t think of many others..
EtherRegen, Renolabs, plenty of others with SFP. It's about marketing. Many customers would buy it just for the SFP.
Computer audio forums are full of content from people wanting network switches for audio with SFP. Not having SFP is a deal breaker.
Exactly. Which is why the switch needs SFP. The switch goes near the end point and other devices (to keep your expensive LAN cables short), and the SFP link (which is cheap) makes the long distance back to the router/backbone switch.
They can, but that is not what they want. They want an audio switch with SFP.
It won't sell in this market without SFP, and the price is the nail in the coffin.
LOL. Their first run is almost sold out. We’ve sold three and one for demo.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That's hilarious! If you are looking for audio gear marketing advice, listen to audiophiles who think they have their finger on the pulse of audiophiles or listen to a dealer who is actually selling into the marketplace?
Other than the X1, I can’t think of many others. Seems like an unnecessary expense and perhaps, even a compromise in sonics from their standpoint. Perhaps adding SFP adds complexity, cost and noise.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Sorry but SFP from point to point eliminates noise potential compared to Ethernet