My quest for the perfect digital source - no, not at any price

Julot

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
209
Location
Paris, France
So, in my quest for the perfect digital source for the system we'll launch in the spring, I got an Antipodes DX music server sent from New Zealand. It took a while, mostly because of French customs and delivery. And then it took a while for it to give its best (if it is there yet), not only because of the burning in and warming up, but also because it turned out that the power I was giving it was inadequate.

DSC_0057.JPG

But after playing with cables and power plugs, I must say, it's one of the finest things I heard. I have an incontrolable urge to go through my whole disc and files collection, but at the same time no desire to stop whatever is playing. The transparency is extraordinary (and I only have very ordinary cables yet), the realism, and at the same time, every recording sounds very different, their faults are very plain, but the music is even more so, it's just taking.

Listening to Götterdämmerung recorded live in Bayreuth in 1955 stereo, this is bewitching -- those voices I only knew through the fog of old mono recordings (Windgassen, Hotter, Mödl) or recorded too late are about as precisely reproduced as in a Kauffmann recording. The acoustics of the Festspielhaus is immediately recognisable, and I surprise myself speculating about where they moved the mics between the take of July 28 and the one of Aug 14. (In July they were over the stage, with sounded somewhat strange but interesting, and there is a strong presence of crackings in the floor... and the prompter).

I am just not thinking about the machine anymore.

I'm using the Antipodes with our own Icos DAC, the Dactablette 4, which, as you can see, double as a stand. It only has coaxial inputs so I got a SOtM USB/SPDIF interface which I'm told will get even better when I give it its dedicated power supply. The rest of the system is my 40 year old Arcane system (OK, it's been updated quite a bit) with its five channel active amplification and LE-8 centered speakers. I can't wait to try the machine on more modern systems. Here's a picture of my Arcane in its precedent location, its summer house:
WP_000139 (1).jpg

The Antipodes serves as a ripper, storage (1T SSD for this one) and renderer, with an USB output. It took me a while to figure out how to use it simply, but I'm there now, it's easy and efficient (my rate of ripping my collection has picked up considerably). Mark, the Antipodes guy, says that people also use it as a NAS with the Lumin with excellent results and then I imagine the direct confrontation depends on the DAC you end up chosing.

I've really been trying to listen to the Lumin -- first at a store when they couldn't make it work (for several hours) and wouldn't call me back ; then with the French importer who called off our meeting at the last minute and mentioned something about coming tomorrow but did not confirm, so I guess I'll just sit there waiting anxiously.

And this weekend I'm scheduled to try the SOtM sMS-100. I'll happily keep everyone posted, especially if I like something.
 
By the way, full disclosure: we'll have Antipodes as a co-exhibitor on the Icos stand in Munich in May. I hope we'll se some of you.
 
Antipodes Audio indeed is known for its cables -- everybody who tried them (and took the time to since they are said to take 7 weeks to burn in) raves about them. I haven't tried them yet, am waiting for my first interconnect.

But in this thread I focus on the music servers they're doing, ie machines that rip, store and render. Mine is in the first picture in the initial post, lying on top of a dactablette. You can also see them here on their website.

Some cables:
images (1).jpg

Some servers:
images.jpg

And here's a recent 6-Moon review.
 
The Antipodes Audio stuff has gained an excellent reputation.

It really has. In fact, Steve Nugent from Empirical Audio says it's the first server he's heard where he thinks FLAC sounds as good as WAV. Antipodes, on their website, make a very interesting case for their take on design choices. However, they have not provided much info on what distinguishes the newly released DX from their DS Reference model. Julot, can you provide some more info on the DX, especially relative to the DS?
 
I haven't heard the DS yet, so I can't attest of the audio difference myself. My understanding is that the DX has a better basic technology (better dynamics, lower noise, less grain, better power supply, better USB output)and a better build (the DS is a standard off the shelf box), and reads DVDs. When I asked Mark Jenkins why I would get a DX rather than a DS, he wrote: "The DX is livelier with greater dynamics, sweeter treble and is more transparent. The DX with SSD is phenomenal -- you feel like everything is just in front of you with no veils left to lift". In general Antipodes' take is to have one cost is no object line (DX server and reference cable) and one come-on-let's-be-reasonable here line (DS and Komaki).


My continuing listening experience is consistent with this. When the machine is properly used, you totally forget about it and just listen to the music and want to listen again to all your music and you don't want to go to bed. It has been a problem for me and required particular discipline. I heard many things in recordings I knew well that I hadn't heard before. Live recordings are my favorites as it really feels like you were there and the emotion is intense. Also, no fatigue whatsoever and a very natural, realistic sound.


I say "properly used" because I have found that the DX is very sensitive to the quality of the power supply and its electrical surroudings (in my old Parisian appartment with a poor electrical installation, there is a difference in sound quality when the washing machine is running) and power cable (you don't want a mess of cables and ground loops in the back if you have many machines, the difference is audible). Also, the warming up is indeed significant, as I'm told it is with the Lumin -- I don't conduct listening sessions anymore if the machine hasn't been plugged for a couple of days.


Yesterday we did one such session at the most respected shop in Paris -- they didn't let me take my gear back. I'll try again today.


FLAC does sound as good as WAV on that machine, with the obvious advantage of the format, but with the caveat that it is Antipodes' specific take on FLAC, totally uncompressed (It's the format at which Antipodes servers rip CDs). AIFF is your next best choice because it sounds almost as good and is available for downloads from many websites (unlike uncompressed FLAC). Usual, compressed FLACs (or ALAC) come next and don't sound as good as AIFF on my server.

Obviously your choice of DAC is important here. I don't know of a really good middle range USB DAC, so we're using our Dactablette 4's SPDIF input with a SOtM USB dX HD interface powered by our own linear PS. The comparison with the USB input on the Meitner MA-1 sounded very favorable to us.

Yesterday I received a pair of Reference Interconnect cables. Mark Jenkins say they require an 8 week burn-in but they sound pretty excellent already (and they should for the price, but we all know that there is no such rule).
 
I'm a big Antipodes fan as well. But should mention that I'm a dealer as well.

However, I only became a dealer because the product blew me away. A customer of mine in Australia some years ago suggested I listen to Mark's cables, so I did and we've been working closely together ever since. We (Vapor Audio) and Antipodes have done 3-4 shows together now, and they're also what I use at home for digital source and cabling.

I'm a former Unix Admin at a Fortune 500 company, so building/optimizing a Linux based music server was piece of cake. However, the Antipodes boxes just sound better than my own servers. So much so that all the ones I built are now sitting collecting dust.
 
Today I tried the Antipodes DX against the Linn Akurate DS. Long story short, the DX won. It won even when we used the Antipodes as a NAS and our DAC instead of the one incorporated in the Linn (both substantive improvements nevertheless). I had an excellent memory of the Linn but in closer comparison, it was not in the same league in terms of transparence, realism, or richness of details. It had a very clear color, not unpleasant, but making all recordings sound more or less the same.
 
Back
Top