Mike, ever tried MBL with Soulution?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
finally got to hear the 101's. to start they were spread pretty far apart - didn't have my laser measure on me but i would guesstimate 10feet and i was sitting about 6 feet back. the sound was nice, nothing impressive. good details, bit too much treble and the bass was a bit disjointed. the speakers were about 3 feet away from the wall behind them (never remember if thats back wall or front wall) and 5+ feet from side wall.
after a few tracks i asked if we could place them closer together, maybe 6 feet or so. this created an equilateral triangle and wow - everything locked in. the vocals and flow were just so impressive and you get this very strange energy from the omni. strange in a good way. the best way i can describe it, you know how in different rooms - even if silent there is some sound/ambiance if you enter...i guess you are hearing the air? that's what the mbl's are able to project as well. it was really intriguing. i also noted excellent dynamics - everything felt very alive. as you moved around the room the soundstage rarely differed which is nice especially for those of us who have our speakers in a living area and have people over regularly. it would be very generous of us to buy such speakers so everyone gets the sweet spot hahaha.
the stage had great depth and the width, while very big, felt so natural. it wasn't calling attention to itself. tonally, i think very similar to magico's in my opinion - i mean that in a good way. everything sounded as it should, pure but with a slight nudge of warmth. we were listening using the class d mbl amps. good stuff but new to me so really hard to make too many comparisons but i couldn't help but think that my symphonic line kraft, with its massive class a power would bring out even more from this speaker as, to my ears, it has that elusive characteristic: flow.
i certainly don't feel like my rig sounds broken or anything after listening to these but i think the 101's are a very worthy upgrade and currently the top of my list. for my ears, granted these are all across different systems and gear, the alsyvox tintoretto really drew me in but i have concerns about them in my room. the mbl's give me a big taste of everything i liked with the alsyvox and seem easier to place in my room. for me, they come across kind of like a magico meets an alsyvox: i think you get that great ethereal sound staging and dynamics of alsyvox with that tone and body of magico. also i played a good mix of not-so-great recordings and compressed tracks and they sounded great.
the mbl's know how to make music!
Skanda - excellent feedback and I agree with you. It’s sad the dealer didn’t bother to set them up properly to begin with. But I’m glad you got them adjusted so you can really hear what they can do. I should add, there are three adjustments on the back of the 101’s to further tailor them to your room and listening preferences.
I thought long and hard about Alsyvox when I first heard them debut in Munich a few years ago, long before anyone was doing backflips about them. I had many emails back and forth with the company and still quite like them, but MBL has been around for 40 years, they offer a full suite of speakers and electronics starting at $10,000 and they are the opposite of a panel speaker in that they have a very wide sweet spot. And to say their support of me and my store has been stellar is an understatement. By March, I will have an MBL Experience Center setup. We will have almost every MBL speaker, including the Xtreme, 101, 116, 120, 126 and all electronics across the Corona, Noble and Reference levels.
But I digress. I think the 101’s would be an excellent step up for you. I’m glad you’re hearing what I hear!
amazing re mbl experience center and by bday is in march too...coincidence!?? i think not!
regarding the demo, it was actually really cool to hear how well the speaker responded to being moved around and gave me some ideas of some minor moves to try in my own system. i'm loving my current sound but as my amp is still burning in the bass is a bit heavier than i'd like so maybe some temporary measures as the amp settles in (i've probably put 50 hours on it at best). unfortunately we didn't get to mess around with the adjustments - from what i understand each adjustment isn't really an attenuation but instead refers to a circuit with different materials?
sound aside, my biggest take away from the demo is that these don't seem as bad to set up as one would think. also as i read about the efficiency more, i don't think these are any more brutal on amps than your average 88-89db box+cone. totally agree, that these would be a nice upgrade - top of the list for me right now. i know i planned on heading down in jan or feb but i am super disorganized and got very bogged down with work+basically lost a week with the flu. hopefully my schedule eases up soon and i can head down. would be awesome to listen to these side by side with an m2/m3 and anything else you think might be interesting.
The MBL 101E MK2 speakers are exceptional transducers. Of course, like any other speaker, appropriate setup is needed. They provide a fantastic musical experience with a huge soundstage, very accurate image with excellent dynamics. I’m driving mine with a D’Agostino Momentum S250 which drives them with nice control and they play plenty loud.
As Mike mentions, they can be easily adjusted in the back of the speaker. My preferred setting is all copper. My room is 20 X 15 X 10.5.
hey ritmo, thanks for sharing. quick question about your set up. i noticed that the s250 has the standard 1 set of speaker out terminals for both left and right channel. are you using a jumper? this is something i'd have to consider if i wanted to use my amp to start/if i wanted to avoid monos and bi amping etc. also, if you had the chance to test, did you notice a significant difference between biamping vs. using the jumper. my guess is probably not since you are still using the s250...
interesting regarding the copper choice. i actually run a loom of wireworld cable in my rig right now (well it used to be a loom but now i have some snazzy new boxes that i am running with stock cables because i've been too lazy to take measurements and order the necessary wireworld cabling). it is my understanding that the internals of the 101 are wired with ww platinum. i use all copper on my rig right now as it helps add some body and smoothness for the not so great records while still allowing the great stuff to shine. this gives me some idea of how the jumper changes might sound but if you have any experiences to share about the sound in your system as you change the settings on the back, would be grateful to read your feedback.
hey ritmo, thanks for sharing. quick question about your set up. i noticed that the s250 has the standard 1 set of speaker out terminals for both left and right channel. are you using a jumper? this is something i'd have to consider if i wanted to use my amp to start/if i wanted to avoid monos and bi amping etc. also, if you had the chance to test, did you notice a significant difference between biamping vs. using the jumper. my guess is probably not since you are still using the s250...
interesting regarding the copper choice. i actually run a loom of wireworld cable in my rig right now (well it used to be a loom but now i have some snazzy new boxes that i am running with stock cables because i've been too lazy to take measurements and order the necessary wireworld cabling). it is my understanding that the internals of the 101 are wired with ww platinum. i use all copper on my rig right now as it helps add some body and smoothness for the not so great records while still allowing the great stuff to shine. this gives me some idea of how the jumper changes might sound but if you have any experiences to share about the sound in your system as you change the settings on the back, would be grateful to read your feedback.
I'll let Mike (Ritmo) respond to your jumper questions. I just want to state that I had the opportunity to hear Mike's setup last week when I was in Florida. There is no doubt in my mind that the S250 is able to handle the 101e MK II's in a nice size room such as Mike's. He has some plans to possibly tweak the speakers position in the room, determine whether he will adjust his room treatments and audition some different speaker cables and PC's. None of these are necessary as his set-up sounds excellent. He just wants to make sure he isn't leaving anything on the table.
Redoing my room with Stillpoint Aperture diffraction panels.
I know the 101E speakers are not typically acoustically treated like conventional speakers.
I'm thinking of either (2) 22" square Apertures stacked vertically stacked or horizontally behind each speaker.
Have 1 to put on center rack when critically listening to music.
No front wall corner treatments or 1st reflection points.
Does this sound similar to what other 101E owners are doing?
Pic is of the old layout with GIK absorption panels.
![]()