- Thread Author
- #1
For years, one of my great joys from "Audiophilia" has been following a constant path of upgrading enroute to audio nirvana. These days, my system has gotten good enough that listening while reading is impossible; I seem always to be putting down a book or magazine in order to just listen to the music -- and not just the music but also how great it sounds to me.
However, recently I had an experience which unnerved me. I purchased a power cord designed to work specifically with all-digital devices such as an Ethernet switch.
Now systems that handle well streaming, HDD, CD, and vinyl are complex. Somehow all those components, cables, and -- in my case -- power conditioning have to work together flawlessly to create a soundstage that sounds not just good, but "great". Frankly, I think some of a system's success, given such overall complexity, is due to luck, and I have been downright lucky in building mine.
And so, I have a dilemma which I wonder whether others have faced and, if so, how they have dealt with it. Is there a time when upgrading is more likely to degrade than enhance further -- when "enough is enough" and the audiophile should just stop searching for that incremental improvement and, instead, simply sit down, and listen?
However, recently I had an experience which unnerved me. I purchased a power cord designed to work specifically with all-digital devices such as an Ethernet switch.
As soon as I inserted this cord into my switch (which is designed for AV usage and employs its own internal switching power supply) and powered up my system, anticipating a yet better than ever sonic result, I heard . . . harshness, exaggerated sibilance, a seeming boost to the high end, and a diminution of the deep bass and clear lushness that typified my system heretofore. At least some of you know, from your own experiences, how horrifying that is!
Now systems that handle well streaming, HDD, CD, and vinyl are complex. Somehow all those components, cables, and -- in my case -- power conditioning have to work together flawlessly to create a soundstage that sounds not just good, but "great". Frankly, I think some of a system's success, given such overall complexity, is due to luck, and I have been downright lucky in building mine.
And so, I have a dilemma which I wonder whether others have faced and, if so, how they have dealt with it. Is there a time when upgrading is more likely to degrade than enhance further -- when "enough is enough" and the audiophile should just stop searching for that incremental improvement and, instead, simply sit down, and listen?